Sara Naveen Kumar v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh,

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. KESHAVA RAO WRIT PETITION No.7978 of 2014 ORDER:

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner..... 2.

The prayer sought in the writ petition is as under:- "... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.2 and 5 in orally instructing the petitioner to bind himself before the 5th respondent without issuing any notice or without giving him any opportunity of hearing as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."

3.

Learned Government Pleader placed on record the written instructions, dated 25.03.2014, issued by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Medchal Police Station, Ranga Reddy District. 4.

From the perusal of the said written instructions, it is revealed that as on the date of issuing the written instructions to the office of the learned Government Pleader for Home, no complaint or case of whatsoever is received or registered against the petitioner on the file of the Medchal Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate. 5.

The allegation of the petitioner that he is being summoned to the Police Station and asking him to bind himself before the Tahasildar, is not true. The allegation of the petitioner that the 3rd

respondent demanded the petitioner to bind himself before the Tahasildar is also denied. The petitioner was never summoned by the respondent police. The petitioner is not at all required in any of the cases registered on the file of the Medchal Police Station and hence summoning him to the Police Station does not arise. However, as a precautionary measure to prevent the police from taking any action in the event of lodging of any complaint against the petitioner in future, the petitioner filed the present writ petition. 6.

In that view of the matter, this Court is of the opinion that there are no merits in the writ petition and the same is liable to be dismissed.

7.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs.

___________________ P. KESHAVA RAO, J 12th November 2019 mar