Salam Bin Yahya v. The State Of Telangana
[ 32ss ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION NO: 5896 OF 2018 Between:
Salam Bin Yahya, S/o Yahya Bin Salam, Caste Muslim, Aged About 58 years, Occupation. Retired Tahasildar, Resident of H.No. 9-11-2, Ahmedpura Colony, Nizamabad.
...PETITIONER AND
1. The State of Telangana, Represented by District Collector, Nizamabad and having its office at Nizamabad
2. The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, Telangana, Hyderabad
3. Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue (Vigilance Wing) Department, Telangana, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lnd ia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ of Mandamus to expunge the words "subject to draft articles of charges submitted to CCLA TS Hyderabad (Respondent No 2) as per the instructions issued under reference 2nd cited" referred by Respondent No'1 in the Letter Addressed to Respondent No 2 to sanction petitioner's Pension vide letter bearing number 411136112017 Daled 15-12-20 17 as unwarranted, illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Principles of Natural Justice and to direct the Respondent No 2 to sanction my Pension without reference to the words "subject to draft articles of charges submitted to CCLA TS Hyderabad (Respondent No 2) as per the instructions issued under reference 2nd cited" as referred in letter bearing number A11136112017 Dated 15-12-2017 lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying thdt in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No 2 to sanction petitioner's pension without reference to the words "subject to draft articles of charges submitted to CCLA TS Hyderabad (Respondent No 2) as per the instructions issued under reference 2nd cited" mentioned in letter bearing number A11136112017 Dated 15-12-2017 and to send the same to AG Office Hyderabad Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI AZIM PARBATANI Counsel for the Respondents: SRI LALITH, GP FOR SERVICES ll The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.5896 of 2O18 ORDER;
Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that after filing of the writ petition, the terminal benefits of the r.r,'rit petitioner are released and the writ petitioner IS recipient of terminal benefits, therefore no further orders are required. I{ence seeks to close this wrrt petition. 2.
Mr. Lalith, learned counsel representing learned Government Pleader for Services-II concedes to the same" 3.
In view of the submissions made by both the counsel, this Court is inciined to close the writ petition. 4.
Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall also stand closed.
SD/. K. VENKAIAH ASSISTANT. REGISTRAR (.]lf SECTION OFFICER I I //TRUE COPY// To, One CC to SRI AZIM PARBATANI Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD Copies S KK D"- GJ P
HIGH COURT DATED:0310412023 ltiE SI4Iq
ORDER
WP.No.5896 of 2018 c) 15 tlAY 20n L CLOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS 6) I \)>