← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/2290/2020allowed no costs

Parikipandala Ashok v. The State Of Telangana

2020-06-16G Sri Devi3 pages

[ 3158 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE ,- TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY :PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2290 OF 2020 Between:

1, Parikipandala Ashok, S/o,Uppalaiah,

2. Boda Naresh, S/o.Samya, Petitioner/Accused-1 and 2 AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court of for the State of Telangana, At Hyderabad.

RespondenUComplainant Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to release the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.59 of 2020 on the file of Kesamudram Police Station, Mahabubabad District The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of SRI A PRABHAKAR RAO Advocate for the Petitioners and PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent, the Court made the following.

ORDER:

The present Criminal Petition, under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is filed by the petitioners/A-1 and A-2 seeking to grant anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest in connection with Crime No.59 of 2020 ot Kesamudram Police Station, Mahabubabad District, which was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 290, 353, 307 read with Section 34 of LP.C.

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State and perused the record. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have not committed the offence and they have been falsely implicated in the above case. He further submits that the petitioners are ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed in the event of their enlargement on anticipatory bail. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Looking into the nature of allegations levelled against the petitioners and other facts and circumstances of the case, without delving into the merits of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners/A-1 and A-2. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the petitioners/A-1 and A2 are granted anticipatory bail subject to the following terms and conditions:

(1) The petitioners/A-1 and A-2 are directed to surrender before the Station House Officer, Kesamudram Police Station, Mahabubabad District, within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of this order and on such surrender, the said Station House Officer shall release the petitioners/A-1 and A-2 on bail on their executing personal bond for a sum of Rs.15,0001 (Rupees fifteen thousand only) each with two sureties to the like amount each to his satisfaction.

--r

(2) The petitionersiA-1 and A-2 shall abide by the other conditions stipulated in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C and co-operate with the lnvestigating Officer in investigating the case.

SD/. JUSTICEG SRI DEVI //TRUE COPY// ,) REGISTRAR ( DrctAL il) SE FFICER r.

1. The Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Mahabubabad District.

2. The Station House Officer, Kesamudram Police Station, Mahabubabad District

3. One CC to SRl. A PRABHAKAR RAO Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CC to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

5. One spare Copy ( r-"y..- To,

HIGH COURT GSDJ DATED:1610612020 .$> a ""s .1

ORDER

CRLP.No.2290al2020 BATL r