← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/6641/2025disposed of no costs

Nanubothu Narsaiah v. The State Of Telangana

2025-03-05Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao5 pages

[ 3304 I HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF IVARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 664'l OF 2025 Between:

Nanubothu Narsaiah, S/o Nanubothu Buchaiah, Aged about 47 years, occ' Assistant Director Oio. The Deputy Director, Drugs Control Administration, Integrated District Complex Office, Room No.24, Nizamabad ...'ETITIONER AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government . -^^ Medical, Health and Family Weliare Department Secretariat, Hyderabad 500

2. The Director General, Drugs Control Administration Government of Telangana Vengal Rao Nagar, Hyderabad - 500 038 ...RES'ONDENTS i Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus directing the 1st RespondenuGovernment forthwith to dispose of the appeal petition dated 2olo1l2o25 submitted by petitioner raising objections in fixing the final seniority list of Assistant Directors, Drugs Control Administration issued in lVlemo No.1573OlEl2O15, dated 03/0'1/2025 by the 2t Respondent and communicated in Memo No.15730/E/2015, dated 0310112025 which is not in accordance with Rule 36 (ii) and (iii) of the Telangana state and subordinate Service Rules, 't 996.

lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to affect any promotions to the posts of Deputy Director of Drugs Control Administration forthwith, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Gounsel for the Petitioner: SRI GUNDRATI RAMAN GOUD Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: ORDER

r') THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVAR^APU RAJESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.6641 OF 2O25

ORDER

Heard Sri Gundrati Raman Goud, learned counsel for the petitioner, and learned Government Pleader for Services-I for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Perused the material on record 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner I was appointed as a Drug Inspector on 31.08.2006 and promoted to the post of Assistant Director on 16.05.2018. The petitioner challenges the final seniority list of Assistant Directors in the Drugs Control Administration issued by respondent No.2 yrde Memo No.l573O/E/2015, dated 03.01.2025. It is stated that the seniority list is not in accordance with the Telangana State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1996, and the petitioner's seniority should be placed above to that of Smt. G. Rajya Lakshmi, as both were regularized on the same date i.e., on 16.05.2018 and seniority should be based on the Telangana State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1996. The petitioner raised objections to the tentative seniority list issued by respondent No.2 on 05.07.2024, and submitted his objections on 08.07.2024, which were not considered. Thereafter the petitioner filed an appeal on 2O.OI.2025 and the same is pending before respondent No.1.

) 3, Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the fixation of seniority by respondent No.2 is not in accordance with the Telangana State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1996. 4.

As per G.O.Ms.No.5, dated 14.02.2003, there should be no reservation in promotion to the post of Deputy Director due to the limited cadre strength and promotion must be based on seniority. 5.

Therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that appropriate orders be passed in the writ petition by directing. the respondents to consider and dispose of the appeal submitted by the petitioner.

6.

Learned Government Pleader for the respondents submits that there is no acknowledgment on the appeal submitted by the petitioner.

7.

Having considered the rival submissions made by the learned counsel for the respective parties, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent authorities to consider and dispose of the appeal submitted by the petitioner, dated 20.0I.2025, and pass a ppropriate orders in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four (04) weeks from the

J date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.

S!D/.A.V.S. PRASAD EPUry REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1.

The Principal Secretary to Government Medical, Health and Family Welfare Department Secretariat, Hyderabad, State of Telangana 500 022 The Director General, Drugs ControI Administration Government of Telangana Vengal Rao Nagar, Hyderabad - 500 038 One CC to SRI GUNDRATI RAIVAN GOUD, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES-|, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] Two CD Copies Nt2.

) 3.

4.

5.

PSK.

LS

HIOU COURT DATED:0510312025

ORDER

WP.No.6641 of 2025 !;,.- ; i'-,t .)9.

\ 2 9 nPn zozs v { t OSS;)ATC\rfO \.-,/, DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS {t+ sl k )-t ,/::'

[*