Smt.Gundluri Bharathi Devi, v. State Bank Of India,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G. SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION Nos. 20867, 29573 and 38539 of 2016 COMMON ORDER: (Per VRS,J) These writ petitions challenge different auction sale notices. It is represented by the learned standing counsel for the respondentBank that pursuant to the interim direction granted by this Court, the auction was held, but there were no takers. Therefore, no further orders are necessary in these writ petitions, as the auction has failed. Hence, these writ petitions are closed, leaving it open to the petitioners to work out their remedies, as and when fresh steps are taken, in a manner provided by law.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions if any pending in the writ petitions shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs. __________________________ V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J _____________________ G. SHYAM PRASAD, J 18th November, 2016 cbs

VRS,J & GSP,J WP No. 20867,29573&38539 of 2016 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN √ AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G. SHYAM PRASAD Writ Petition Nos. 20867, 29573 & 38539 of 2016 (Per VRS,J) 18th November, 2016 cbs