Konduru Suresh Kumar Reddy v. Government Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By Its Principal
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
[ 3302 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOUR.\BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 18339 OF 2008 Between:
1 . Konduru Suresh Kumar Reddy, S/o. Sri Ramana Reddy Business Rl/o.Gl, Plot No.8, Gayathri Nagar, AllaIur, Borabanda, Hyderaba<i-18.
2. Mantena_ A1j.gryya Raju, S/o. Late M. Subba Raju Retd. Service Rl/o. H No.A32, Hilt Ridge Viitas, Nationat cames Viilage, CacniOoWi, frfaliaOiJ_ 32.
3. A. Ramachandra Reddy, S/o.. Sri Naga Reddy Business R/o. Durganagar Colony, Panjagutta. Hyderabad.
4. C. Sudhakar, S/o. Late C. Balakrishnaiah Bustness Ryo. D.No.6, Gayathri Nagar, Hyderabad-38.
5. K. Tirumala Prasad, S/o. K. Sambasiva Rao Business R/o. H. No.1-.1-.,lg0/23, RTC X Roads, Musheerabad, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONERS AND Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its principal, Secretary, Revenue, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
Commissioner of Land Administration, Nampally, Hyderabad. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy Dishict.
The Tahsilar, Qutbullahpur Mandat, Ranga Reddy District. The District Revenue Officer, Ranga Reddy District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Anicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High - Cdurt may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direciion declaring the action of the respondents in not processing the applications submitted by the petitioners in relation to the plots covered'under the Sale Deeds vide Doc.No.7432l.1985, dt. 0S..1 1.1985 oi the first petitioner, Doc. Nos.5553/1 985, D1.05.11.1985 & t17Bl1gAS, dt.13.12.198S of the second petitioner, Doc. Nos.71761 1985, dr. 28.i0.1995 & 2431/i985. Dt. 05.11.1985 of the third petitioner, Doc.Nos.37.t 7/1 98S, Dt. 16.05. 1 985 and 3819/.1985,
dt.22.05.1985 of the fourth petitioner and Doc.Nos.3965/1985, dt. 25.05.1985 & 2986/1985, dt. 22.05. 1985 of the fifth petitioner, under G.O.lr,4s.No.166, dt. 16.02.2008 as illegal and arbitrary and further direct the Respondents to consider the applications submitted by the petitioners in the light of the said GO. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2008(WPMP. NO: 23871 OF 2008) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim stay of dispossession of the petitioners from their respective plots covered under the Sale Deeds vide Doc.No.743211985, dt 05.11.1985 of the first petitioner, Doc. Nos.5553/1985, Dt.05.11.1985 & 717811985, dt-13.12.1985 of the second petitioner, Doc.Nos.717611985, dt. 28.10.1985 & 7431l1985, Dt. 05.1'1.1985 of the third petitioner, Doc-Nos.3717l1985, Dt. 16.05.1985 and 3819/1985, d1.22.05.'1985 of the fourth petitioner and Doc. Nos.3965/1985, dt. 25.05.1985 & 2986/1985, dt. 22.05.1985 of the fifth petitioner, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI C. RAGHU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER i
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITIO N No.183 o9 of 2OO8 ORDER:
appearing for the Petitioners Learned Counsel in the Writ Petition does not submit that the cause survive and thereby the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
2.
Recording the above said submission' the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous' No order as to costs.
3. As sequel to it, Miscellaneous Petitions' if any pending, shall stand closed'
To, SD/.P.NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTAryIEEGISTRAR //,RUE coPY// sE&il'il oFFtcER
1. One CC to SRI C. RAGHU, Advocate IOPUCI i. i*J cc"I"-oi FoR nrveruue' Higti court for the state of Telangana' 3.
BN tourl Two CD Copies sw \1-
\ HIGH COURT DATED:3011212022 1 HE STAT o, \
ORDER
Jo U 3 [ IAl{ ?08 WP.No.18339 of 2008 Ct \\ u,.
'r\-* , { ._o ':l"TC!
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS 6cq% \4,_6tr'r