B. Mahitha Reddy v. The State Of Telangana

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE P.NAVEEN RAO W.P.No.7287 of 2019 ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue for respondents.

2.

Petitioner claims to be owner of land to an extent of Ac.11-25 gts. in Sy.No.84/2/A31 situated at Pulimamidi village, Kandukuru mandal, Ranga Reddy district. She made an application to the 4th respondent-Tahsildar for conducting survey and for fixing boundaries in respect of the said land. Alleging inaction on the representation made for conducting of survey, this writ petition is filed. 3.

When the matter is taken up, learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the petitioner made application in physical form, whereas the Government has an online web portal and applications of this nature have to be made in the prescribed proforma through online only. Apparently, petitioner has not made such application.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner did not deny this statement of learned Assistant Government Pleader. Therefore, it cannot be said that the respondents are negligent in acting upon the representation made by the petitioner for conducting of survey.

5.

Thus, leaving it open to the petitioner to submit F-line application through web portal of the State, the Writ Petition is dismissed. It is needless to observe that if any such application is made by complying with all the required formalities, the same shall be considered and appropriate orders be passed in accordance with law, after putting on notice the neighbours, within a period of two months from the date of making such application. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

____________________ JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO Date: 8.4.2019 DA

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE P.NAVEEN RAO W.P.No.7287 of 2019 8.4.2019 DA