Kandagatla Rama Swamy, v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh,

[ 32s6 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 2978 OF 2014 Between:

Kandagatla Rama Swamy, S/o. Late Gopaiah, Aged about 75 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Kodakandla Village and Mandal, Warangal District. ...PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by the Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

The District Collector, Warangal, Warangal District. The Tahsildar, Kodakandla Mandal, Warangal District. J ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.3 in interfering with his possession and trying to demolish the structures raised by the petitioner in the land to an extent of Ac.0.10 guntas in Sy.No.89/A to E of Kodakandla Village and Mandal, Warangal District without issuing any notice and without due process of law is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and consequently to direct the respondent No.3 not to interfere with his possession in respect of the structures situated in the land to an extent of Ac.0.10 guntas in Sy.No.B9/A to E of Kodakandla Village and Mandal, Warangal District.

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 3634 0F 2014) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.3 not to interfere with his possession in respect of the structures situated in the land to an extent of Ac.0.10 guntas in Sy.No.gg/A to E of Kodakandla Village and Mandal, Warangal District pending disposal of the Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V. PRAKASH REPRESENTING FOR SRI D.Y.L.N. CHARYULU Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER I

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.2978 of 2014 ORDER:

Sri V. Prakash, learned counsel representing Sri D.y.N.L.N. Charyrrlu, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous.

2.

Recording the said submission, the writ petition IS dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.

es s r s rflr?-nI'5GY'IXA //rRUE COPY// t,- SECTION OFFICER

1. One CC to SRI D.Y.L.N. CHARyULU, Advocate [OPUC]

2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the Staie of Telangana. touTl

3. Two CD Copies To, BN GJ pru.q.

HIGH COURT DATED:1911012023 lrE STAI€ ( q (j 0 fl N0v 2023 a {+ * I il a

ORDER

Ot- ^.TC'

.'(.j, WP.No.2978 of 2014 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS @o* z-\ii\>r'