M. Krishnama Chary, Dist. Warangal. v. The Industrial Tribunal-Cum-Labour Court And Another

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITION No.25629 of 2006 ORDER:

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner has attained the age of superannuation and the petitioner has challenged the order dated 20.04.2006 passed by the 1st respondent in I.D.No.22 of 2003, wherein no relief was granted to the petitioner. The petitioner is seeking the relief of reinstatement into service by setting aside the removal order dated 27.06.2001. At this point of time, the reinstatement of the petitioner is not feasible. However, this Court is of the considered view that this writ petition can be disposed of directing the respondents to pay service benefits to the petitioner for the service rendered by him prior to his removal, if not already paid, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, J Date: 01-02-2019 Prv