← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWA/359/2023withdrawn

Kummari Hema v. The District Collector

2023-04-18Abhinand Kumar Shavili,Pulla Karthik4 pages

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABOO[,,,. ] TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVIL] AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT APPEAL NO: 359 OF 2023 Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Lefters Patent preferred against the order dated 31-01-2023 in W.P No. 6930 oI 2020, on the file of the High Court. Between:

Kummari Hema, D/o. Kummari Suresh, Age 26 years, Rt/o. H.No.1-30, ponnari Village, Tamsi Mandal, Adilabad District.

AND ...AppellanURespondent No.3

1. The District Collector, Adilabad, Adilabad District.

2. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

...Respondents/Respondents

3. Nigulapu Mounika, D/o. N. Rajeshwar, Age. 26 years, No. H.No.2-2-112, Kurannapet, Nirmal, Adilabad District.

...RespondenUWrit petitioner lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim suspension of the orders passed by the Learned Single Judge in W.P.No.6930 of 2020, dated 3'l .01.2023, pending disposal of the above writ appeal.

Counsel for the Appellant: SRl. S SURENDER REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 & 2: GP FOR SERVICES - ll Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI B. SUDHAKAR REDDY The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT APPEAL 0.359 0F 2023 JUDGMENT: (per AKS,J) Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Appeal with a liberty to the appellant to file review petition before the learned Single Judge seeking review of the impugned order, dated 31.01.2023, passed in W.p.No.6930 of 2020, in view of the fact that the downloaded copy of B.Sc. examination results of the appellant is available with the appellant and admittedly, the appellant has not produced the same before the learned Single Judge, while adjudicating the subject Writ petition. 2.

Permission is accorded.

3.

Granting liberty as sought for, the Writ Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. It is made clear that the interim order, dated 03.04.2023, passed by this Court shall continue for a period of one ( 1) week from today, so as to enable the appellant to file review petition. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Appeal shall stand closed.

SD/-I. NAGALAKSHMI DEPUW REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTI OFFlCER To,'1. One CC to SRl. S. SURENDER REDDY Advocate [OPUC]

2. Two CCs to GP for Services-ll, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

3. One CC to SRI B. SUDHAKAR REDDY, Advocate TOPUCI

4. The District Collector, Adilabad, Adilabad District.

5. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

6. Two CD Copies CHR GJP ..o cHrI t

HIGH COURT DATED:1 810412023 -..e> .\$- "fl

JUDGMENT

',, W.A.No.359 of 2023 .,.,, DISMISSING THE WRIT APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS tss