High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/6521/2015disposed of no costs

Chandramalla Raju v. . State Of Andhra Pradesh

2015-07-23B.Siva Sankara Rao3 pages

HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.6521 OF 2015 ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners/A1 to A3 under Section 482 Cr.P.C seeking to quash the proceedings in crime No.59 of 2015 of Women Police Station, Rajahmundry Urban, East Godavari District, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 498-A r/w 34 I.P.C and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor (Andhra Pradesh) for the State before notice to respondent No.2/de facto complainant and before admission.

The above crime was registered on the report of respondent No.2/de facto complainant. A1 is the husband, A2 is father-in-law and A3 is brother-in-law of the 2nd respondent. Perused the material on record. As the facts fall short for this Court to admit the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., this application is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioners to surrender before the learned Magistrate and move for regular bail with notice to Additional Public Prosecutor and in such an event the learned Magistrate shall hear and grant bail on the same day with necessary conditions. Needless to say, at the post bail stage pending investigation, the presence of the petitioners before the Court can be dispensed with. In the event of police

filing final report or any cognizance taken by the Magistrate, further remedy is left open to the petitioners.

Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. B. SIVA SANKARA RAO, J Date:23-07-2015 pab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT

HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH ***** CRIMINAL PETITION No.6521 OF 2015 Between:

Chandramalla Raju and two others ... Petitioners and The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by Public Prosecutor and another ... Respondents DATE OF JUDGEMENT PRONOUNCED: 23-07-2015 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:

HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA

RAO

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgment?

Yes/No Yes/No 2.

Whether the copies of judgment may be Yes/No marked to Law Reporters/Journals?

Yes/No 3.

Whether Their Ladyship/Lordship wish to Yes/No see the fair copy of the Judgment?

Yes/No