Telangana Rashtra Munnurkapu Mahasaba v. The State Bank Of Hyderabad

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH * * * THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No. 36814 of 2015 BETWEEN Telangana Rashtra Mannurkapu Mahasaba, rep. by its President Sri Pilly Srinivas. ... PETITIONER AND The State Bank of Hyderabad, rep. by its Branch Manager and others ...RESPONDENTS Date of Order pronounced: 30.11.2015 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed complaining of the restraint put by the respondent-Bank in permitting the petitioner to operate Petitioner-Society's account with the respondent-Bank.

2. On 13.11.2015 while issuing notice on admission a direction was issued to the respondent-Bank to consider petitioner's representation dated 02.06.2015 as per Bye-Laws of the petitioner-Society.

3. Counter affidavit is filed on behalf of the respondent inter alia stating in paragraph 4 that the respondent-Bank has permitted the petitioner to operate the account and that the respondent-Bank will follow directions of the Court. It is stated that the Bank has no role to play with regard to the Management of the Society and their internal disputes.

4. In view of the fact that the Bank having permitted the petitioner to operate the account, petitioner does not press the writ petition as the cause of action does not survive. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

_____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J November 30, 2015 LMV