Rudra Sreenivas, v. V.Ushakola Shankar,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3896 OF 2013 Petition under Arlicle 227 of Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the Order dated 06/08/2013 in lA No.462l2013 in OS No.93/2006 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Jagtial.

Between:

Rudra Sreenivas, S/o. Mallaiah, ...PETITIONER/ PETITIONER/ DEFENDANT NO.2 AND '1 . V.Ushakola Shankar, S/o. Rajam, ....RespondenU RespondenU Defendant No.1

2. Kanle Shankar, S/o. Pedda Rajam, ...RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT/ PLAINTIFF For the Petitioner : SRI GHETLURU SREENIVAS, Advocate For the Respondents : SRI P.V.NARAYANA RAO, Advocate The Court made the following: ORDER

THE tlON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHIER CIVII= xEVISION PETITION No.3896 of 20J.3 ORDER:

No representation For both sides.

2, The case status placed by the Registry befcre this Court reveals that the subject suit in O.S.No,93 of 2006 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Jagityal, was disposed of ot 22. 11.2018. Therefoi-e, nothing survives for adjudication in this Civ I Revision Petition, which is filed challenging the interlocutory order passed ln the said su t.

3.

In view of the same, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stanC closed. Sdr.I.RANGA BABU ott .1,*2;EGrsrRAR ,TRUE COPY// I SE,CTION OFFICER To 1.

2.

J.

4.

Kj The Senior Civir Judge, at Jagtial'

One cc to Sri Cnet'uru Sreenivas, Advocate (9Pt]!i) on; ;; i; sri P v.Nar"yana Rao, Advocate (oPUC) Two CD CoPies

HIGH COURT DATED:04/03/2020 46% 2 3 tiitY 2m v Vrr \t-o..rt :,./ '";r''

ORDER

CRP.No.3896 of 2013 DISMISSING OF THE C RP AS INFRUCTUOUS.

t 0t