Rajasekhar Addaguduru v. M/S Sunwatt International Private Limited
\
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
IMONDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIM INAL PETITION NO: 1955 OF 2019 Between:
1. Rajasekhar Addaguduru, S/o. Shambulingam, Aged 59 years, Rlo. 4-57, Vikasnagar, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad
2. Madhavapeddy Venkateswarlu, S/o. M.Radhakrishna Murthy, Aged 59 years, R/o. 17A, Pisapativari street, Vijayawada, Krishna District. ...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.3 & 4 AND M/s Sunwatt lnternational Private Limited, a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and having its office at MIG C-20, Dr.A.S.Rao Nagar, ECIP Po, Hyderabad Rep.by its Managing Director, Anil Kumar Nair. ...RESPONDENT
2. The State of Telangana, Rep.by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hvderabad ...RES'.NDENT/..M'LAINANT Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C.,praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.461 of 2018, on file of the lll Special Magistrate, Malkajgiri, Cyberabad. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioners in C.C.No.461 of 20 18, on the file of the lll Special Magistrate Malkajgiri, Cyberabad.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P.NAGENDRA REDDY, Advocate for the Petitioners and Sri TAGORE BALA, Advocate for the Respondent No.1 and the Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.2 The Court made the following: ORDER
THE H|)NOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION No. 1955 OF 20L9 ORDER:
This Cnminal Petition is filed by the petitioners seeking to quash proceedings in C.C.No.461 of 2018, on the lile of III Special Magistrate Court, Malkajgiri, Cyberabad. 2.
On O3.O2.2O25, at the request of learned counsel for the petitioners, the matter was directed to be posted on IO.O2.2O25 'finally' and it was made clear that no further adjournment '"r,ill be granted thereafter. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. In the said circumstances, this Court is not inclined to keep the petition pending. 3.
Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. However, in the event of cause survives in the matter, the ASSISTANT REGISTRAR n\ )..- 'sE:croN oFFtcER r petitioners are at liberty to move the Court. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed Sd/. T. TIR MA //TRUE COPY// To,
1. The Court of lll Special Magistrate, Malkajgiri, Medchal' Cyberabad.
2. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]
3. One CC to SRl. P NAGENDRA REDDY,Advocate [OPUC]
4. One CC to SRl. TAGORE BALA, Advocate [OPUC]
5. Two CD Copies / /
l HIGH COURT DATED:1 0102t12025 \ \ .', g. :r ler, a 1o.'
1E APN 2M
ORDER
o5 t CRLP.No.1955 of 2019 t DISMISSING HE CRIMINAL PETITION /z *z;