Madduri Srinivas, v. The Government Of Telangana State, Rep. By Its Principal
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. KESHAVA RAO WRIT PETITION No.20736 of 2014 ORDER:
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The prayer sought in the writ petition is as under: "... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in threatening to take action against the petitioner without any case being registered and harassing the petitioner is contrary to law, illegal and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 1st respondent to take disciplinary proceedings against the 2nd respondent as he committed illegal interference in the petitioner's life and liberty."
Learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents placed on record the written instructions dated 14.10.2019 issued by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Jinnaram Police Station, Medak District.
From a perusal of the said written instructions, it is evident that a case in Crime No.75 of 2014 for the offence punishable under Section 110(e) Cr.P.C. of Bollaram Police Station was registered against the petitioner and others on 23.04.2014 and after completion of investigation, a final report was filed. After taking cognizance of the offence, the same is numbered as C.C.No.463 of 2014 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medak. On 09.06.2014, the learned Magistrate found the accused guilty for the offences with which they were charged and directed to pay a fine of Rs.1,500/-. Calling and threatening the petitioner without any case being registered is specifically
denied. It is also mentioned in the written instructions that on the allegations made by the petitioner against the SubInspector of Police to the Superintendent of Police, the said Sub-Inspector of Police was transferred to DSB, Sangareddy vide D.O.No.1607 of 2004 dated 06.08.2014 from Jinnaram Police Station, Sangareddy District.
In view of the above, this Court is of the opinion that no further cause would survive in the writ petition and the same is liable to be dismissed.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed.
_____________________ P. KESHAVA RAO, J Date: 15.10.2019.
ES