K. Nagendra v. The Deputy General Manager,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.2855, 2856, 2865, 2918, 2923, 2974, 3521, 3530, 3558, 3626 and 3634 of 2011 COMMON ORDER When the matters are called, learned counsels representing the respective parties submitted that the subject matter of these writ petitions is covered by the decision of this Court in W.P.No.6470 of 2006 and batch, dated 23.06.2014.

2. In paragraph 54 of the judgment dated 23.06.2014 in W.P.No.6470 of 2006 and batch, the learned Single Judge held as under:

"In the above facts and circumstances, it is to be held that the Common Award dated 17.05.2005, of the Industrial Tribunal has not addressed the issue independently, but has simply gone by the conclusions arrived at by the learned Division Bench of High Court of Orissa. In the light of distinction drawn above, the said judgment of the High Court of Orissa has no application to the facts on hand. Accordingly, all the batch of writ petitions is allowed, thereby, setting aside the common award dated 17.05.2005 passed in I.D.No.222 of 2001 and batch by the learned Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad.

Consequently, the respondent Bank is directed to reengage the petitioners in the positions which they had been occupying prior to the termination of their services and further consider their cases for regularization, as and when substantive vacancies arise, if already such vacancies are not available. There shall be no order as to costs".

3. These writ petitions also arise out of the award dated 17.05.2005 passed in I.D.No.157 of 2002 and batch on the file of the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad.

4. Thus, in terms of the said judgment, these Writ Petitions are

allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in these writ petitions, shall stand closed. ___________________ P.NAVEEN RAO, J 19th July, 2016 sj