Pamidi Vijaya Kumar v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh And Another

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.631 OF 2016 ORDER:

The petitioner/A.3 has preferred the present criminal revision case by invoking the provisions under Sections 397 and 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.,) being aggrieved by the order dated 18.12.2015 passed in Crl.M.P.No.11 of 2015 in C.C.No.3 of 2014 on the file of the Special Judge for SPE and ACB Cases-cum-II Additional District and Sessions Court, Nellore, whereby the learned Judge dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner/A.3 seeking discharge from the proceedings initiated against him. Heard and perused the material available on record. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner confined his arguments with regard to dispensing with the presence of the petitioner before the Court below.

Considering the nature of allegations and also as the question of identity of the petitioner/A.3 does not arise, the presence of the petitioner/A.3 before the Court below is dispensed with except on the dates when the Court below insists for his appearance. The petitioner/A.3 is permitted to represent his case through the counsel before the Court below. The Criminal Revision Case is accordingly disposed of. Consequently, the miscellaneous petitions pending in this petition, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO 01.07.2016 pln