← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaAS/468/2003dismissed as not pressed

The A.A.E., (Operation), v. B. Stayavathi

2022-11-22P.Sree Sudha4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA APPEAL SUIT O: 468 OF 2003 Appeal Under Section 96 of CPC against the Judgment and Decree dated 20-08-02 passed in O.S No. 154 of 1997, on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Khammam Between:

1. The A.A.E., (Operation),, A.P. Northern Power Distribution Company Limited, Bhadrachalam.

2. The D.E., (Operation ), A.P. Northern Power Distribution Company Limited, Bhadrachalam.

3. The S.E., (Operation ), A.P. Northern Power Distribution Company Limited, Yellandu Cross Road, Khammam.

4. The Chairman,, A.P. Northern Power Distribution Company Limited, Vidyuth Soudha, Hyderabad.

...Appellants.

AND

1. Boddu Stayavathi, Wo. late Durga Prasad, Aged about 22 years, Occ: Household, R/o. Ashok Nagar Colony, Bhadrachalam, Presently R/o. Sangampalli (V), Warangal District..

2. Boddu Seshagiri Rao, S/o. Subba Rao, Aged about 50 years, Occ: Private Employee, R/o. Ashok Nagar Colony, Bhadrachalam Town, Khammam District.

3. B. Veni Kumari, Wo. Seshagiri Rao, Aged about 45 years, Occ: Household, R/o. Ashok Nagar Colony, Bhadrachalam Town, Khammam District. ,

...Respondents

Counselfor the Appellants :Sri. V. AJAYAKUMAR (Not Present) Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: Sri. K. SITA RAM The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE P. SREE SUDHA A.S.No 464 of 2OO3 \ \

JUDGMENT

When the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the appellants. On 2L.1O.2O22 also, there is no representation for the appellants and therefore, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal'. Today also, there is no representation for the appellants. Therefore, this Court is of the considered view that the appellants are not interested to pursue the litigation.

Hence, the Appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs.

a Pending miscellaneous applications' if arLy ' shall stand closed'

/ ./ Sd/- K.SRTNIVASA RAO JOINT //TRUE COPY// OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge, Khammam

2. One CC to SRl. V. AJAYAKUMAR, Advocate [OPUC]

3. One CC to SRl. K. SITA RAM, Advocate IOPUC]

4. Two CD Copies NJB "\V PSR

:

/ !

!I i HIGH COURT !

PSS,J DATED:2211112022 V\tr $TA}A

JUDGMENT

Y.

AS.No.468 of 2003 1 1 [P$ 2$23 o THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS.

i :