P. Shankar v. The Government Of Telangana

[ 32ss ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) NO: 2660 OF 2017 I Between:

I I P. Shankar, S/o. P. Narahari, Aged about 49 years, Occ. School Assistant (English) At ZPHS, Kolanoor, Odela Mandal, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District. ...PETITIONER I AND

1. The Government of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad - 5O0 022.

2. The Commissioner & Director of School Education, Saifabad, Opp: A.G. Office, Telangana, Hyderabad.

3. The District Educational Officer, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District.

4. The Head Master, At ZPHS, Kolanoor, Odela lvlandal, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District.

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Courl may be pleased to declare the action of the respondents in recovering the salary of 6th & 7th of January, 2014 from the applicant's salary vide proceedings dated 30.O7.2014 of the 3rd respondent, instead of adjusting the above said two dates as a eligible leave in the account of applicant is highly illegal, arbitrary, . unreasonable, discriminatory and in violation of principles of natural justice and without any application of mind and declare the same as bad in law and consequently direct the respondents to adjust/treated as eligible leave in the account of applicant instead of recovering the salary from the applicant for two days in this month.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI C.RAJA SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES The Court made the following: ORDER

HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) No.2660 OF 2017 ORDER:

Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition (TR) does not survive for further adjudication and the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents has fairly acceded the same. 2.

Recording the above submission of the learned counsel appearing on either side, the Writ Petition (TR) is closed. 3.

lYiscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.

SD/-K.SREERAMA MURTY ASSISTANT REGFTRAR d SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] One CC to SRI C.RAJA SEKHAR REDDY, Advocate IOPUCI Two CD Copies PSK.

BS psR

HIGH COURT DATED:0210212023 t 9 STAT6

ORDER

WP(TR).No.2660 of 2017 L) ) 1B li,il$ ?[8 'l/ * i1r- . .: r, - cLosrNG THE WRrr PETTTTON (TR) WITHOUT COSTS.

hz t \o v"

gsk