The Kakatiya Urban Development Authority Rep By Its Vice Chairman Hanamkonda, v. M/S. G. Vikas Reddy And Co.,
HIGH GOURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO:39 1 0F 2018 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated 29.01 .2018 in W.P.No .2303 of 2018 on the file of the High Court' Between:
The Kakatiya Urban Development Authority' Rep by its Vice Chairman' Hanamkonda' Warangal District.
...A''ELLANT AND Ir,4/s. G. Vikas Reddy & Co., A registered Partnership Firm' Rep by its l\/anaging Partner. G. Shivender Redd;,'dil'i:'6!!9lt ii;iv''ag"o maloi' Rro Plot No 171' Road No.13, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 5uu urr ...RESPONDENT lA NO: 'l oF 2018 PetitionUnderSectionlslCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedinthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the 2303 of 2018 dated 29.01 2018, Pending order under aPPeal Passed in WP No disposal of main aPPeal.
Counsel for the Appellant: SRI M' AJAY KUMAR' s. c: ;ii;i kerinlve u R'BAN DEVELoPM E Nr AUrHoRrrY Counsel for the Respondent: SRI M' SUDHIR KUMAR The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON,BLE THE CHTEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JT]STICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT APPEAL No.39l of 2018 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice llima Kohli) 1.
Learned counsel for the appellant states that the present appeal hasbeenrenderedinfructuousasthewritpetitionfiledbythe respondent was withdrawn on 08.07'2019'
2.
The present appeal is accordingly disposed of as infructuous ,,""* *r:L:l:_ll..o,"t applications, if anv'
UL U R SD/.CH.VENKATESWAR DEPUTY REGIST ,TRUE COPY// SECTI N FFICER One CC to Sri M. Ajay Kumar, S C for Kakatiya Urban Development Authority To, I 8,|"'a% to sri M. sudhir Kumar, Advocate toPucl Two CD CoPies.
P vr IV
HIGH COURT DATED:02102t2021 '
-($E SIA
ORDER
oo 0gt'4AR 2021 ci { i{ WA.No.391 of 2018 Df." - i.T r, DISPOSING OF THE WRIT APPEAL AS INFRUCTUOUS O