Sri Tadipathri Babu v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Represented By Its Principal
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.2282 OF 2016 ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Revenue.
This Writ Petition is filed for non-implementation of the order, dated 23.09.2015, passed in the appeal vide D.Dis.No.6932/2014/C, by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam, the 3rd respondent herein. The appeal was disposed of with the following directions:
".... On receipt of the representations from the appellants and respondents, the Tahsildar, Bheemunipatnam shall implement the said order and make necessary changes and entries in the relevant Revenue records against the concerned respondents and issue the Pattadar Pass Books and Title Deeds to them as per the procedure laid down under the A.P.R.O.R. Act 1971. Both the parties are directed to submit heir representations before the Tahsildar, Bheemunipatnam along with this order for implementation. The appeal is disposed of with these observations."
While the petitioners state that no action is taken thereafter by the Tahsildar, Bheemunipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatnam, the 4th respondent herein, learned Government Pleader for Revenue on instructions submits as under: "In this connection, I submit that as per orders of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam vide D.Dis.No.6932/2014/C., dt 23.09.2015, the petitioner applied for making Sub Division records manually without paying any requisite fee for Sub Division work. But as per present norms, the petitioner has to apply for making any preparation of Survey Sub Division record for the subject land through Meeseva with requisite fee for Rs.250/- on each Sub Division.
In view of the above, since the petitioners are seeking subdivision, they are required to pay requisite fee for the subdivision and learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners would comply with the requirement as pointed out. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioners to comply with the said requirement, and the 4th respondent shall thereafter take up the matter in accordance with the directions of the 3rd respondent as extracted above and do the needful without further loss of time. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
____________________________ VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR, J 28.01.2016 KH