← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/16932/2010dismissed as infructuous

V.Suryanarayana,Panjagutta,Hyderabad v. Govt Of Ap., Animal Husbandry,And Fisheries And Another

2024-11-14Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao4 pages

[ 3304 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 16932 OF 2010 Between:

V.Suryanarayana, S/o.Veera Raju, Aged about 56 years, Occ: Executive Engineer (under suspension) Fisheries Department, F/o.PJ-4, Panjagutta Officers colony Panjagutta, Hyderabad ...PETITIONER AND

1. Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Special Chief Secretary, Animal Husbandry ,Dairy Development and Fisheries, (Fish-l) Department, Secretariat Buildings Hyderabad

2. The Commissioner of Fisheries, Santhi Nagar, Street No.4, Near Masab Tank, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declaring the action of the respondents in not implementing the pay scales granted in G.O.Ms.No.2'l3 Finance (PC-ll) Department dated 27.8.2005 and G.O.Ms.213 Finance (PC-l) dept dated 25.2.2010 in favour of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, and discriminatory and further direct the respondents to forthwith implement G.O.ms.No.213 Finance (PC-ll) Department dated 27.8.2005 and G.O.Ms.No.52 Finance(PC-l) Dept dated 25.2.2010 in the interest of justice.

LA. NO: 1 OF 2010(wPMP. NO: 21363 0F 2010) PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to direct therespondentstoimplementG.o.ms.No.2l3Finance(PC.ll)Departmentdated 27.8.2005 and G.O.rns No.52 Finance (PC-l) Dept dated 25'2'2010 in favour of the petitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition' Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI NAGAIAH, REPRESENTING FOR SRI N. BHARAT BABU Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR FISHERIES The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 16932 ()F 20lO ORDER:

Sri Nagaiah, learned counsel representing Sri N.Bharat Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.

2.

In view of the above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.

\ ,/TRUE COPY/I "'is$'ti'lfrPT$'Ei3 SECiION OFFICER E-flt"?33 1 i 0fl "3S3li,L?

t'""Jtate or rer a ns a n a' at To One CC to Sri N' B Two CCs to GP for Hvderabad [OUT] Two CD CoPies J TJ MP 1lr,-l-1

l l HIGH COURT DATED:1411112024 ::i::.

1 i\E I t';r;...l:\ (\ c Y QJo t) J A

ORDER

t:

WP.No.16932 o12010 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.

l,r \V ltt LoW ( b