High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/2545/2020disposed of no costs

Hanumadri Suresh And 7 Others v. The State Of Telangana And Another

2020-06-18T.Vinod Kumar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T,VINOD KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2545 OF 2020 Between:

1. Hanumadri Suresh S/o Hanumadri Verkataiah, Aged.38 years, Occ. Pvt. Employee R/o H.No.10-86/1/A, Vinayaknagar Balanagar, Hyderabad -500 042.

2. H.Venkataiah, S/o late H.Bala Goud Aged. 68 years, Occ. Retd. Pvt. Employee R/o H.No.10-86/1/A, Vinayaknagar Balanagar, Hyderabad- 500 042.

3. H.Bharathi, Wo H.Venkataiah, Aged.60 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o H.No.1086/11A, Vinayaknagar, Balanagar, Hyderabad - 500 042.

4. H.Naresh, S/o Hanumadri Venkataiah. Aged. 32 years, Occ. Pvt. Employee, R/o H.No.10-86/1/A, Vinayaknagar, Balanagar, Hyderabad- 500 042.

5. G.Chandrakala, Wo G.Satish Goud, Aged. 34 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o H.No.16-7-705, Osmanpura, Chadarghat, Hyderabad - 500 024

6. G.Satish Goud, S/o G.Pradeep Goud Aged. 36 years, Occ. hrt. Employee. R/o H.No.16-7-705, Osmanpura, Chadarghat, Hyderabad - 500 024

7. T.Aruna, Wo Ravi Goud, aged. 39 years, Occ, Housewife, R/o Block No.207, Prajay City Apartments, Miyapur, Hyderabad -500 049 B. T. Ravi Goud, S/o Late T.Narsimha Goud, Aged. 46 years, Occ. Business, R/o Block No.207, Prajay City Apartments, Miyapur, Hyderabad -500 049 .,...PETITIONERS AND

1. The State of Telangana through Police Station Neredment, Rep. by Public Prosecutor High Court ofTS

2. Smt.H.Rajani,WoH.Suresh,aged2T years,Occ.PrivateService,R/oH.No.3026512U6, Santhoshimanagar, Old Safilguda, Hyderabad - 500 ...,.RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to QUASH the FIR N0.374 of 2020 of PS Neredment pending on the file of XIX Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, At. Malkajgiri LA. NO: 1 OF 2020 :-Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to STAY of all further proceedings including arrest of accused Nos.1 to B in FIR No.374 of 2020 of PS Neredment. pending on the file of XIX Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, At.

Malkajgiri pending disposal of main Criminal Petition This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri SRIDHAR LENDALAY ,Advocate for the Petitioners and the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of None appeared for the Respondent No.

THI} }.ION'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUIVI,AIT CRIMINAL PETITION No.2545 of 2O2(', ORDER:

The presient criminal petition is filed under St:ction 482 Cr.P.C. seekirLg to quash the proceedings in Crirne i FiR No.374l2O2A, dated 05.06.2020 of Neredmet :oli:e station pending on th(l file of XIX Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Malkajgiri registered against the petitioners / arral,ed .ts accused Nos.1 to 8, for the offences punishable under Secti,rns 498-4 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 . 2.

The pres,ent criminal petition is taken up for hea ring today, i.e. 18.06.2020, through Video Conferencing.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners u nd the learned Additional Putrlic Prosecutor, appearing for responde nt l\o.1. 4.

Though learned counsel for the petitioners fi.ed the present criminal petition lor quashing the proceedings in tlLe above crime, he restricts his prayer to the limited extent of seeking a direction to the investigating authorities to follow the procedure prescribed under Section 4 1-A Cr.P.C. and the guidelines :iet out by the Hon'ble .Apex Court in the case of ARJVESII KUMAR V/s. S?ATE OF BIHARI.

Learnec. Additional Public Prosecutor suL,mits that the respondent police authorities would follow the guidelines prescribed lrv the Hon'ble Apex Court in ARMSII K[/]{AR's case (supra).

r (2014) E SC( :73

Having regard to the submissions made as above, the respondent police authorities / investigating agency are directed to follow the procedure prescribed under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. and abide by the guidelines as set out by the Hon'ble Apex Court in AR]\,DSI' KUMAR,s case (supra).

Subject to the above, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. sd/-K. AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR f]"

SECTION,OiFICER To, //TRUE COPY I I

1. The XIX Metropolitan Magistrate, Malkajgiri Cyberabad

2. The Station House Officer, Neredment police Station Neredment Cyberabad

3. One CC to SRI SRIDHAR LENDALAY Advocate [OpUC]

4. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court for the State oFTelangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

5. Two CD Copies

HIGH COURT TVKJ DATED:18/06/ 2020 ra s e $ () t) 2 6 JUil2020

ORDER

CRLP.No.2545 of 20:10 a') * P,AT * DISPOSING OF THE (:RLPMINAL PETITION L4 b 7o /..'