M/S. Tasneem Suratwala v. Mr. Shabbir Suratwala
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF IVARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY F.C A. NO: 113 OF 2007 Appeal under Section 19 of Family courts Act, against the Judgment/ decree in oP No.254 ol 2OO4 daled 23lo1l2oo2 on the file of the court of the Judge, Family Court, Secunderabad.
Between:
Ms.TASNEEM SURATWALA, ...APPELLANT AND tt/T.SHABBIR SURATWALA, ...RESPONDENT Forthe Appellant: MS. VASUDHA NAGARAJ, Advocate For the Respondent : SRI N.RAGHAVAN, Advocate The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
Itern No.2 THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. \'IJ,\YSEN IIEDDY F.C.A.No.l l3 of 2007 JUDGMENT: (Per the IIon'ble the Chief Justicc IIima Kohli) I .
On 0 i .03.202 I , none was present on behalf of the appellant. 2.
Today, learned counsel appears fbr the appellant and states that the present appeal has been rendered infructuous inasmuch as it relates to the custody of a minor child, who has by now become a major, having attained 20 years of age.
3.
The present appeal is, accordingly, disposed of as infructuous along with the pending applications, if any.
Sd/.K.SREENIVASA RAO JOINT REGIS R ,TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Judge, Family Court, Secunderabad'
i. o"i, Cci"'rtls. Vdsudha'Nagaral Advocate (oPUC) A. 5# dd i"'sii rv.nrshavan,"Adv'ocate (oPUC)
4. Two CD CoPies K
HIGH COURT DATED:'1710312021 TA l-€ t\E a.) !
APB o .A * * E6?
JUDGMENT
FCA.No.113 ol 2007 DISPOSING OF THE APPEAL AS INFRUCTUOUS.
W