Milap Kothari v. The State Of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE :PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8001 OF 20'17 Between:

Milap Kothari, S/o. Late Sh. Karpoor Chand Kulish, Aged about 66 years, 1I, Hospital Road, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan - 302001 AND ... Petitioner/Accused No.2 1 . The State of Telangana., Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad.

2. Rajiv Trivedi, Former Additional Commissioner of Police (Crime and SIT)' Hyderabad' AP ... Respondenucomptainant Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to allow the petition by quashing the proceedings in Crl.MP.No.126 of 2017 in CC.No.3 ol 2OO7 order dated 11-08-2017 passed by the Hon'ble ll Addl. Metropolitan sessions Judge at Hyderabad, and the Learned Trial court may further be directed to conduct inquiry in compliance of provisions of section 202 of Cr. P-C. lA NO: 1 OF 2017 (CRL.M.P.No.8481 of 20 171 Petition under Section 482 of Cr-P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in C.C.No.3/2007 on the file of the Court of the Hon'ble ll Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad pending disposal of the criminal petition.

The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of sri A chandra Shaker Advocate for the Petitione(s), Public Prosecutor Advocate for the Respondent No.1 and Sri Nageshwara Rao Pappu Advocate for the for the Respondent No.2.

The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION No.8OO1 OF 2OL7 ORDER:

1.

l,earned counsel for the petitioner submits that cause in this Criminal Petition does not survive for adjudication and has become infructuous.

2.

Recording the aforesaid submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

3.

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

SdL K. VENKAIAH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// \ SECTI N OFFICER To, 1 . The ll Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Nampally, Hyderabad.

2. One CC to Sri. A Chandra Shaker Advocate [OPUC]

3. One CC to Sri. Nageshwara Rao Pappu Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

5. Two CD Copies.

Y]R NJB 6

HIGH COURT DATED:1510912023

ORDER

r'.

.t. : ix,7 O $^) /:, CRLP.No.8001 of 2017 .:

f i 0[I2m ,I DISMISSING OF CRL.P.

AS INFRUCTUOUS 0, \