P. Ganesh Rao v. Union Of India, Rep. By Defence Estate Officer,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE T.AMARNATH GOUD WRI T PETI TI ON NO. 22331 OF 2014 ORDER:

The petitioner filed this Writ Petition aggrieved by the order dated 28.5.2014 passed by the 2nd respondent in rejecting the application of the petitioner for sanctioning of building construction permission.

It is seen from the impugned proceedings dated 28.5.2014 that the 2nd respondent has only directed the petitioner to comply with certain objections and resubmit the plan. It is further seen that the impugned letter is only a correspondence between the 2nd respondent and the petitioner and it is not an order rejecting the application of the petitioner.

In view of the above, the Writ Petition is not maintainable. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to make a fresh representation enclosing all the relevant documents by bringing all the events to the notice of the 2nd respondent in view of the changed circumstances if any, and upon such representation, the 2nd respondent shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders. The Writ Petition is disposed of.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.

_____________________ T. AMARNATH GOUD,J Date: 19.12.2018 KPM