Shaik Azam v. The State Of Telangana

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO Crl.P.M.P.No.17588 of 2014 in Crl.P.No.16026 of 2014 and Crl.P.No.16026 of 2014 Common Order:

T h e defacto complainant and his counsel M/s.A.Maheswari are present. Accused Nos.1 and 2 and their counsel M/s.Mohd. Mumtaz Pasha are present.

Accused Nos.3 to 14 are absent and they are represented by A.1 who is their G.P.A Holder.

Heard both sides and perused the petition.

On the complaint given by defacto complainant, the Police of Amberpet P.S registered a case in Crime No.119 of 2013 against accused for the offences under Sections 324, 506 r/w 34 IPC and investigation is stated to be pending.

Now the submission of both sides it that at the intervention of elders, both parties have amicably resolved their disputes and in view of the same, the complainant decided to withdraw the proceedings in FIR No.119 of 2013 on the file of Amberpet P.S and hence, permission may be accorded to them to enter into compromise and record the compromise quash the proceedings in the interest of justice.

Having regard to the above said submission and considering that the fact that it is a family dispute wherein

the parties have amicably resolved their disputes and now the complainant is willing to withdraw the proceedings in FIR No.119 of 2013 on the file of Amberpet P.S and further considering that no useful purpose will be served even if the parties are driven to enquiry in the said case and following the decision reported Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and another[1], this petition is allowed, permission is accorded and compromise is recorded in terms of the accompanying memorandum of compromise and consequently, the proceedings in FIR No.119 of 2013 on the file of Amberpet P.S are hereby quashed. In the result, both the petitions are accordingly disposed of.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

_________________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J Date: 05.02.2015 scs [1] (2012) 10 SCC 303