Mrs.Massarrath Afrose, v. The State Of Telangana,

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WP No.11508 of 2017 ORDER ::

The case of the petitioner (represented by GPA holder) is that she is absolute owner and possessor of land to an extent of 771 sq. yards situated at H.No.2-26, in Sy.No.64 of Gachibowli village, Ranga Reddy District, having purchased the same under a registered sale deed dated 18-01-1983. On a requisition made by the Police department for construction of office building of Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad, the respondent-authorities initiated land acquisition proceedings and acquired certain patta lands including the land of the petitioner for the said purpose. That the petitioner and other land oustees were informed by the respondent-authorities that alternative sites would be provided in exchange of their lands under acquisition and some of the land oustees were allotted alternate lands in Sy.No.91 and other survey numbers in Gachibowli.

2.

The grievance of the petitioner is that having acquired the land in question, till now the respondents have not paid neither compensation nor allotted alternative land. Hence, this writ petition.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner strenuously contended that the petitioner made representation on 26-09-2013 and as no action has been taken, another representation dated 26-03-2016 was submitted to the Hon'ble Deputy Chief Minister, and the same was forward to the respondents, pursuant to which, 4th respondent got enquired into the matter and submitted his report to the 3rd respondent on 20-06-2016 confirming that the land of the petitioner situated in Sy.No.64 was acquired, but in spite of the report being submitted by the 4th respondent, no action has been taken by the 3rd respondent. 4.

Learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition submits if petitioner makes a fresh representation the same would be considered in accordance with law, since there is change in division after formation of new districts.

5.

A perusal of the report dated 20-06-2016 submitted by the 4th respondent to the 3rd respondent, it is clear that the land of the petitioner has been acquired, and no action has been taken by the 3rd respondent. In the circumstances, the petitioner is permitted to make a fresh representation by enclosing a copy of the report of the 4th respondent and other documents to the 3rd respondent-RDO,

Rajendranagar Division, and on such a representation being filed by the petitioner, the 3rd respondent is directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with law, not later than three months from the date of receipt of representation from the petitioner. 6.

The writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall also stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

____________________________ A. RAJASHEKER REDDY,J Dated: 28-04-2017 NRG

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WP No.11508 of 2017 //WEB// Dated: 28-04-2017 NRG