← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLRC/632/2018dismissed as infructuous

Kallem Raja Shekar Reddy v. Kallem Kalpana

2023-06-06K.Surender3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 632OF 2018 Criminal Revision Case filed under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C aggrieved by the Judgment daled 18.12.2017 passed in Crl.A.No. 5O1 ot 2017 on the file of the Court of the XIV Additional District & Sessions Judge - cum- XIV Additional Metropolilan Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar against the Judgment dated 23.03.2017 passed in Crl.M.P.No. 1772 of 2016 in DVC No. 32 of 2016 on the file of the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class cum Xl Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar. Between:

1. Kallem Raja- Shekar $.e{d_y, S/o. Late Prathap Reddy, Age: 35 years, Rt/o Kodicheda Village, Kollur Mandal, Mahaboobnagar Distiict

2. Rallem Praveen Reddy,- 9io. Late Prathap Reddy, Age: 30 years, Rl/o Kodicherla Village, KollJr Mandal, Mahaboobnagar Di'siric -

3. Kallem Lalithamma, Wo. Late Prathap Reddy, Age: 57 years, F/o Kodicherla Village, Kollur Mandal, Mahaboobnagar DistriLt ...PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS AND '1. Smt. Kallem Kalpana, Wo. Raja Shekar Reddy, D/o. Jadala yadagiri Reddy, fge.: 3.Q years, Rl/o. H.No. 11-79., Pragathi Na!ar., p and T Cotony., Dilshukhnagar., Hyderabad

2. The State of Telanoana, Rep. by its public prosecutor., High Court at Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PETITIONER Counsel for the petitioners :

Sri J. RAJESHWAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : Sri V.V. SATISH COUNSEI fOr thE RESPONdENT NO.2 : Sri M. MURALIDHAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC The court made the forowing: .RDER PRosEcuroR TT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL REVISIoN CASE No.632 OF 2018 ORDER:

Learned Counsel for I hc revision petitioners submits that the cause in this Crim inal Revision Case does not survive for adjudication and the same has become infructuous Recording the aforesaid submission, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructlrous Mrscellar-reous applications pending, if any, shal1 stand closed Sd/-T.KRISHNA KU AR DEPUW REGIS R //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, ThqXlV Additional District & Sessions Judge - cum-The XIV Additional Metiopolitan Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L B Nagar' in" JrOi"irf Magistrate of First Class cum Xl Metropolitan Magistrate' Cyberabad at L.B Nagar'

Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor' High Court for the State of Telangana at ?

Hvderabad. (OUT) ol,"-rci" sriL. inlesHwnn, Advocate lol-ucl o;; aa io sri v.v SATISH' Advocate [oPUC] Two CD CoPies "\rf Njb plp

t I HIGH COURT DATED:0610612023 -"j::::=::'

-,: Gt_ t ia, c2 ?f , |', /) s \\ .\},$ ?- + o ORBER CRLRC.No.632 of 2018 )J i'i 9iH + DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE AS INFRUCTUOUS.

(^ v/ ".\