Aradhyula Rama Rao, v. Tadiboina Rajyalaxmi,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [Special Original Jurisdiction] MONDAY THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND SIXTEEN PRESENT Between:

Aradhyula Rama Rao ...

Petitioner/Plaintiff V/s.

Tadiboina Rajyalaxmi ...

Respondents/Plaintiff .

Counsel for the Petitioner:

Sri A.V.V.S.N. Murthy Counsel for the Respondent:

Sri N. Sri Hari The court made the following:

[order follows]

O R D E R :

Aggrieved by the order dated 26/07/2016 passed by XIAdditional District and Sessions Judge, Tenali, Guntur district, in I.A.No. 1074 of 2015 in OS.No. 91 of 2014, allowing the application filed by the respondent/defendant under section 5 of Limitation Act 1963 seeking to condone the delay of 389 days in filing the petition to set aside the ex-parte decree dated 17/9/2014, this Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioner/plaintiff under section 115 of CPC.

2. Sri A.V.V.S.N. Murthy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner/plaintiff submits that the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous.

3. Recording the above submission, the Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

4. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand disposed of.

__________________________________ JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT.

21/11//2016 I s L

Date: 21/11/2016 Circulation No. 7 3 Court Master: I s L