Mr. Abdullah Bin Mohammed S/O. Mohammed Bin Ahmed, v. State Of Telangana Rep. By Its

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE S.V.BHATT W RI T PETI TI ON No.3 5 6 8 2 of 2 0 1 6 ORDER:

The petitioners challenge notice No.944/ GPM/ 2016 dated 20.09.2016 on several factual and legal grounds. The apprehension now canvassed by the petitioners is since the complaint is forwarded to the fourth respondent - gram panchayat from CM peshi, the respondents are not conducting any enquiry or considering explanation/ documents read with building permission relied upon in support of their right, title and possession in Sy.No.19/ 2. 2.

I have perused the writ affidavit, show cause notice dated 20.092016 and the explanation dated 05.10.2016. Prima facie, this Court is of the view that the challenge to the show cause notice is not made out and no relief can be considered for granting against the show cause notice challenged in the writ petition. 3.

Be that as it may, once a notice is issued by the fourth respondent, the fourth respondent has acknowledged the explanation said to have been filed by petitioners, the same shall have to be examined, if necessary, properly enquired into and the property in possession of petitioners is also identified and appropriate orders are passed.

4.

Mr. G. Narender Reddy, learned standing counsel for fourth respondent, states that since show cause notice is issued, the fourth

respondent will strictly act in accordance wit law and pass orders within four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The statement is placed on record. The writ petition is disposed of with the observations indicated above.

As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

____________ S. V. BHATT, J October 21, 2016 DSK