Sabavath Srinivas v. The State Of Telangana
,l [31s8 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE :PRESENT:
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE G.SRI DEYI CRIMINAL PETITION NOz 3223 OF 2021 Between:
Sabavath Srinivas, S/o. Umla Nayak, Petitioner/Accused No. 2 AND The State of Telangan4 Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court ofTelangana State, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad Respondent Petition under Section 438 of CI.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition and the grounds filed therein, the High Court may be pleased to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner/Accused No.2 in FIR No. 671 of 2020 dated 24.09.2020 lodged with the PS, Meerpet, Rachakonda District;
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed therein, and upon hearing the arguments ofSri R.Anurag, Advocate for the Petitioner, and ofthe Asst. Public Prosecutor, for the Responderit, the Court made the following.
L THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI CRIMINAL PETITION NO.3223 OF 2O2I ORDER:
This Criminal Petition, under Section 438 of the Code of Crimina-l Procedure, 1973, is filed by the petitionerlA-2 seeking to grant anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No.671 of ZOZO of P.S. Meerpet, Rachakonda, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 42O, 468 and 47 | of the Indian Penal Code. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/A-2, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State and perused the record. Learned counsel for the petitioner/A-2 would submit that the petitioner is innocent of the offences alleged against him and has been falsely implicated in the case. It is submitted that initially, his name was not mentioned in the FIR and subsequently, during the remand of the other accused, the name of the petitionei has been cropped up.
The petitioner is having fixed abode and there is no question of absconding.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the peculiar conditions of pandemic COVID-19 prevailing in the country' without delving into the merits of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner/A-2'
The Criminal Petitio,n is allowed and the petitioner/A-2 is granted anticipatory bail subject to the following terms and conditions:
(1) The petitid4er/A-2 is directed to surrender before the Station House Officer, P'S' Meerpet' Rachakonda' within a period of four weeks from the date of this order and on such surrender, the said Station House Officer sha-ll release the petitioner I A-2 on bail on his executing personal bond for a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees two lakh on\r) with two sureties for a like sum each to his satisfaction.
(2) Commencing from the month of June, 2027, the petitioner/A-2 shall appear before the Station House Officer concerned on every Saturday between 10.00 am to 5.00 pm till completion of investigation and liling of fina_l report.
(3) The petitioner/A-2 shall not be indulged in similar type of offences in future and if it is found that he is indulged in similar type of offences in future, the liberty granted to him shall automatically stand __
J cancelled and he would be taken into custody forthwith.
(3) The petition er/ A_2 shall abide by the other conditions stipulated in Section 43g(2)Cr.p.C and co_ operate with the Investigating Oflicer in investigating the case.
Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.
SD/- R. KARTHI A.SSISTA RE //TRUE COPYII To, / SECTION OFFICER
1. The II Mehopolitan Magistrate, Rachakonda, L.B. Nagar, RR District.
2. The Station House Officer, Meerpet Police Station, Rachakonda Commissionerate.
3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telanganq at Hyderabad (OUT)
4. one CC to Sri R.Anurag, Advocate (OPUC)
5. one Spare Copy
Gv-.
--.-1 4-1',V1 HIGH COURT GSD,J / DATL;29-4-2021
ORDER
cRL.P. NO. 3223 oF 2o2l ,/ PETITION ALLOWED / ./z ,121 2s \e