R.N.Reddy Colony Welfare Association v. The Government Of Telanagana
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
[ 3302 J HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENW NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE I PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 32352 OF 2014 Between:
R.N.Reddy Colony Welfare Association, rep by lts President, T.Hanumantha Rao, S/o late Brahmaiah, Aged about 70 years, Occ Retd Ernployee, H.No.14-46, R.N.Reddy Colony, Meerpet, Grampanchayat Meerpet, Saroorangar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.
...PETITIONER AND The Government of Telangana, rep by its Prl. Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad 1.
The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Lakadikapool, Hyderabad. 2.
The Districi Panchayat Officer, Ranga Reddy District 2nd Floor, PISGA Complex, Nampally, Hyderabad.
The Meerpet Grampanchayat, rep by its Executive Officer, Meerpet Grampanchayat, Saroornagar Mandal, R.R.District. 3.
4.
Ravula Srinivas, S/o late Shankariah, aged about 42 yearc, Occ Business, Plot No.106, B.N.Reddy Nagar, Vanasthalipuram, Ranga Reddy District. 5.
...RESPONOENTS Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents No.2 to 4 in not taking action against the Respondent No.S for his unauthorised construction in Plot Nos.'154 and 155 situated at R.N.Reddy Colony, Meerpet Grampanchayat, saroornagar Mandal, R.R.District, which is against the permission dated 3-9-201 3 by the ztth respondent and the provisions of section 121 of the A.P.Panchayatraj Act and but also violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondent No.2 to 4 to take immediate action.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014{WPMP . NO:402142 OF 20141 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No.1 to 4 to stop the respondent No.5 from completing the construction of unauthorised Cellor + 7 floors over his plot bearing No.154 and 155 of R.N.Reddy Colony, Meerpet Grampanchayat, Saroornagar Mandal, R.R.District, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.VARA PRASAD RAO (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondent No.l & 3: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI P.RAGHAVENDER REDDY, SC FOR GRAM PANCHAYAT Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI P.CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDy The Court made the following: ORDER
_THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.32352 ot 2Ol4 ORDER:
This petition is coming lor hcaring sincc 2O 14. On L6.12.2O23, when the maltcr was called. there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, and therefore the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption "for Dismissal". Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that Lhe pctitioner is not interested to prosecute this case 2.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for Non-prose cution/default. The re shall be no order as to costs.
3.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any in this petition , shall stand closed SD/. K.SREERAMA MURTH AsstsrANT \ECISTRA \)../ Y R //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER One CC to SRt p.VARA PRA!4D RAO, Advocare tOpUCI one cc to sRr p.GHANDR1:.E[IA!-iiil;;;;ffi;te ropuc] One CC to SRI P.RAGHAVENDER REDDI d; FoFi GRAM PANCHAYAT loPUCl Two CCs to Gp FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV, High Court for the f.lrl";lr"trnsrna at Hyderabad IOUTI ;ffi":r::.ttt.?"FoR REVENUE' Hish court for the state of retansana at Two CD Copies &, To, 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
BSR GJ
HIGH COURT DATED: 2911212023 /t 1 ..e -j!_ ' -r-,..1, L'-t_ -t e.\ t-S"
c LI i:.
\ d J'-
ORDER
? slirt )+ WP.No.32352 of 2014 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON-PROSECUTION/DEFAULT, WITHOUT COSTS @41i"
Quv % i