Bar Asociation Khammam Dist v. Pusam Bapanaiah. And30 ORS
[ 3377 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO: 1042 OF 2000 Writ Appeal under clause '1 5 of the Letters Patent Appeal preferred against the order dated 27.06.2000 passed in W.P.No.'15106/1993 on the file of the High Court.
Between:
Bar Association, Kothagudem, rep. by its President V.Purushotham Rao, S/o. V.Venkata Apparao, aged about 40 years, Rl/o. Kothagudem, Khammam District.
...APPELLANT AND
1. Pusam Bapanaiah
2. Tuniki Jogabai
3. Pusam Dharma Raju
4. Turam Lakshiminarsu
5. Tellam Muthamma
6. Vage Rajamma
7. Matta Sanyasi
8. Matta Venkataiah
9. Matta Nagaiah
10. Matta Adeiah
11. Kanithi Chinnamma 12.Koka Buchmma
13. Matta Rama Chandraiah
14. Madkam Kannaiah
15. Matta Muthaiah '16. Turam Veeraiah
"r/
17. Midiyam Dakshmaiah 1 8. Punem Adeiah '19. Pitta Raghavaiah
20. Pusam Nagalakshmi 21 . Matta Suraiah 22.Matta Subbaiah
23. Kanithi Rajulu
24. Suriyam Polamma
25. Thuram Papa Rao
26. Thuram Ramaiah 27 .Thuram Papaiah
28. Irtladdala Krishna Murthy
29. Soyam Venkata Swamy (Respondents 1 to 29 are R:/o. Badhrachalam, Khammam District) ...PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS
30. Subordinate Judge (Senior Civil Judge), Kothagudem, Khammam District. 31 . !and Acqursition Officer (Special Deputy Collector), Kothagudem, Khammam District.
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS l.A. NO: 1 OF 2000(WAMP. NO: 1966 OF 2000) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Judgment of the learned Single Judge, dated 27.06.2000, rendered in W.P.No.15106 of 1993, pending disposal of the above Writ Appeal No.1042 of 2000 on the file of High Court.
Counsel for the Appellant: SRI K.S.NAGA NARASTMHA REDDY, REp. FOR SRI C.V.MOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 29: SRI Y.RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.31: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No.1O42 of 2OOO JUDGMENT : (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice AIok Arad.he) Mr. K.S. Naga Narasimha Reddy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. C.V. Mohan Reddy, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant, submits that the writ appeal has been rendered infructuous on account of efflux of time. 2.
The aforesaid submission is placed on record. 3.
Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- CH.VENKATESWARULU DEPUW REGISTRAR I @ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to SRI C.V.IMOHAN REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]
2. One CC to SRI Y.RAMA RAO, Advocate [OPUCI 3.TwoCCstoGPFoRLANDACQUlSlTloN,HighCourtfortheStateof Telangana at HYderabad [OUT]
4. Two CD CoPies BSR GJ \.,
HIGH COURT DATED: 1711012023 1r\E STAre ( '+ ,:] oo [ 6 ll0\l 2[n
JUDGMENT
WA.No.1042 o12000 +t DISMISSING THE WRIT APPEAL AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS vj xs>