R. Ram Prasad v. The State Of Ts
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEI/BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITIO N NO: 2694 0F 2018 Between:
1 Ravulaoalli Ram Prasad' S/o, Nagabushanam ' R/o' Narsapuram,m, dr.-r,]guO"m [,4andal . Bhadaradn Kothagudem District
2. Ravulapalli Ravi Kumar, S/o Nagabushanam' R/o Narsapuram m' ' ijr.i.iliroem Mandal., Bhadaradri Kothagudem District
3. lrl.Ramu, S/o.Ratnam, R/o Atapaka ' Atapaka tr'4andal ' Bhadradri Kothagudem District "'PETITIONERS/ACCUSEDNo'2'a AND The State of Telangana, rep' by its Public Prosecutor' High Court at Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT Petition under Section 482 of Cr'P C ryu.y,inS that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of G'";;;;-"ib;minat p"tition'rtl" niqn court mav be pleased to call for records ,n tonnJ"t-io-n"*[n oiJ"" at'.1,+'l,'i"zoli in crl'M P No' 2515 of 20'1 s in C.C.No. 187120L ilIi"'ii;
o'i t'e Honor" 't'o"iat Magistrate of I Class at Ahadracnalam and quash the same t.A.
NO: 1 OF the circumstances stated ioh Court may be Pleased Jf the Petlt io n e r/Acc u sed file of the Honble Judicral sal of the above criminal i n t n e H,lI. J, a io ;;
1 i g1;';xx. i : : l ll tg ";$"":,}"". i to stay ail further procee".";:*"i.;iu": 187/2011 on the No 02 to 04 in connecttor il"ro;.l,;l""ot i Ctutt at bnalracnatam ' pendins dispo Petition under Section 482 of Cr'P C qra'yi'1S- that in petition.
This Petition coming on for hearins 'T: 1,""t';::,i::Y:il3fil"ffiil *: lllXl ";^XU:::U:i#:,ffi1:?
:T;"'il ;:;;''" * "''"'
o n b e h a r of the Respondent No 1'
"
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR Criminal Petition No.2694 of 2018 ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P C' seeking to quash the order dated 14.11.2017 passed in Crl'M.P. No.2515 of 2017 in CC No.187 of 2011 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Bhadrachalam, wherein the petitioners are arrayed as Accused Nos.2 to 4.
Today, the matter is listed under the caption ,infructuous matters' and when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, based on the e-courts case status report, would submit that after full_fledged trial, the case was disposed of by the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Bhadrachalam, through judgment dated, 24.O2.2020 wherein the matter has resulted in conviction of the accused and as such, the present quash petition filed does not need any further consideration by this court, as the petitioners/A.2 to A.4 are entitled to avail remedy of appeal against the said conviction.
Having regard to the submissions made as above, no further orders need be passed in the present criminal petition.
Accordingly, the criminal petition IS closed. However, the petitioners/A.2 to A.4 are at liberty to file a petition seeking to reopen the matter, in the event the said CC has not been disposed ol by the trial Court as noted above.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this criminal petition shall stand closed.
Sd/.I.NAGA LAKS MI ASSISTANT REGI ,TRUE COPY// SECTIO OFFICER I To, The Judicial First Class Magistrate, at Bhadrachalam. The Station House Officer, Bhadrachalam Town Police Station, Bhadrachalam Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] One CC to SRl. MUMMANENI SRINIVASA RAO Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies
HIGH COURT TVKJ DATED:291'1212020 i4 S tl ( /\ o (-) 7:
O >.
11 JAI 2021 --t
ORDER
CRLP.No.2694 of 2018 CI-OSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION .!N I copraf t il\- o-1 \o\ ./ \\ \--o*t