← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP(TR)/4149/2017disposed of as infructuous

N Karuna Sri v. The District Educational Officer

2022-11-29N.V.Shravan Kumar4 pages

[ 3255 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY,IHE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) NO: 4149 OF 2117 Between:

N.Karuna Sri, Wo. A.Shravan Kumar, Aged about 49 years, School Assistant (BS), Z.P.H.S. Tekumatla, Chityala Mandal, Warangal District, R/o. Chityal. ...PETITIONER AND

1. The District Educational officer, Warangal District, Warangal.

2. The Commissioner and Director of School Education, State of Telangana, Hyderabad. 500 004.

3. The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad-S00 022.

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ol lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare that the applicant is entitled for 10 entitlement points under spouse category in terms of Rule 6 (ll) O of the Transfer Rules issued in G.O.Ms.No. 12, dated 16-6-2015 with all consequential benefits by holding the action of the respondents in not awarding 10 entitlement points under spouse grounds to the applicant on the untenable ground that the applicant and her husband are working in separate districts which is illegal, arbitrary, unjust. l.A. No: 1 OF 2017(WVMll(T&.NQ:809 OF201l) Between:

1. The District Educational officer, Warangal District, Warangal.

2. The Commissioner and Director of School Education, State of Telangana, Hyderabad. 500 004.

3. The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad-S0O 022.

...'ET'T'ONERS AND N KARUNA SRl, Wo. A.Shravan Kumar, Aged about 49 years, School Assistant (BS), Z.P.H.S. Tekumatla, Chityala Mandal, Warangal District, R/o. Chityal

L.

.,..RESPONDENT Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated:09-07-2015 in OA.No.362412015 Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. D. BALA KISHAN RAO Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court made the following: ORDER

HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) No.4149 OF 2017 ORDEII:

Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous with the efflux of time and no further orders are required in the Writ Petition(TR).

2.

In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition (TR) is dismissed as infructuous. 3.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to cost.

ASSTsTAS?/Rtd3+hT //TRUE coPY// M-- secrrdJHdrFrcen To, '1. Two CCs to GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION ,High Court for the State of Telangana,at Hyderabad [OUT]

2. One CC to SRI. D .BALA KISHAN RAo,Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CD copies BM GJP x-

HIGH COURT DATED:2911112022 * 1'% (q t1 lril?ffi I <.

\

ORDER

WP(TR).No.4149 of 2017 DrsMrsstNG THE W.p.(TR) AS TNFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.

w \ CD