Mohd. Wahab Khan, Secbad. And Ano v. The Prl. Secy., Revenue Dept., Hyd. And 2 Oths

[ 33031 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION NO.200't0 0F 2009 Between:

1. Mohd. Wahab Khan, S/o. Late Mohd. Afzal Khan Business F/o' H No' 6-1358, New Bhoiguda, Secunderabad. 2.Mohd.HabeebKhan,S/o.Latelrllohd.AfzalKhanBusinessRl/o.H.No.6-1358, New Bhoiguda, Secunderabad. ...PETITIONERS AND The Government of A.P., Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Assn' POT) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad The Distdct Collector, Hyderabad District.

The Mandal Revenue Officer, Secunderabad District' J ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue order direction more particularly one in the nature of the writ of Mandamus declare the action of the respondents in not considering the applications filed by the petitioners on 25.09.2008 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for regularization of unauthorized occupation of the Government Land situated in survey No. 15 an extent of 330 sq. Yds. of each petitioner of Bolakpur Village, Bokkalaguda, New Bhoiguda, Secunderabad as per the G'O'Ms' No 't 66 Revenue (Assn. POT) Department Dt. 16.02.2008'

t.A. NO: 1 OF 2009(WPMP. NO: 26088 OF 2009 ) Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to direct the respondents to consider the application filed by the petitioners on 25.09.2008 for regularization of unauthorized occupation of the Government Land situated in Survey No. 15 an extent of 330 Sq. Yds of each petitioner of Bolakpur Village, Bokkalaguda, New Bhoiguda, Secunderabad as per the G.O.Ms.No. 166 Revenue (Assn. POT ) Department Dt. 16.02.2008 pending d isposal of the writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI K. MADHAVA RAO REPRESENTING SRI P. R. K. AMERANDRA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: OROER

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO WRIT PETITION No. 2OO1O of2OO9 ORDER:

When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri K.Madhava Rao, learned counsel representing Sri P.R.K.Amarendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication.

2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

SD/- T. JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGIS //TRUE COPY'

SECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SRI P. R. K. AMERANDRA KUMAR' Advocate IOPUCI

2. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

3. Two CD CoPies MP GJP

HIGH COURT DATED:2911112023 \{g STAre q 2 tj 0Ec 2$23 d "6 * o R n WP.No.20010 of 2009 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS @*'n 8a--- ffiP