Gyara Dayakar v. The State Of Telangana
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT
HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.3853 of 2026 DATE: 23.03.2026 Between:
Gyara Dayakar and others.
...Petitioners/A.1 to A.6
AND The State of Telangana, Rep.by its Pubic Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana.
Hyderabad.
.... Respondent
O R D E R
This Criminal Petition is filed under Sections 480 & 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS') by the petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 6 seeking to enlarge them on bail in connection with Crime No.47 of 2026 on the file of Bommalaramararm Police Station, YadadriBhongir, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 62 and 191 read with 190 of the BNS. 2.
Heard Sri Satyam Reddy, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri Sarasani Rahul Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners-accused Nos.1 to 6 and Sri M.Ramachandra
- 2 - Reddy, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing for the respondent-State.
3.
The case of the prosecution is that the de facto complainant lodged a report before police on 25.02.2026 wherein it is stated that on 21.02.2026 his brother performed love marriage with one Soundarya and brought her to home on 24.02.2026. Thereafter, the relatives came and forcible took her to the Village. Thereafter, the petitioners made a phone call and asked him to come to Ramalingampalli to discuss the marriage issue. On the same, at about 23:40 hours, the victim proceeded towards Ramalingampalli village in a Tata Indica Car bearing registration TA31T0044 along with his friends. Upon reaching the outskirts of the village, the vehicle stopped due to low diesel. The victim informed Soundary's relatives over the phone that the car had stopped and that he was proceeding towards the village on foot.
At that time, A-1 to A-9 arrived on their motorcycles, wrongfully restrained the victim on the road, threw chilli powder into his eyes and assaulted him with knives. As a result of which, he sustained multiple bleeding injuries on his chest, hands, back and other parts of the body.
- 3 - take necessary action on the said complaint. Basing on the which police registered a case against the accused for the aforesaid offences.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners-accused Nos.1 to 6 would submit that the petitioners innocent of the offences alleged against them; that there are no enmity between the parties; that the injured person was already discharged from the hospital and that the petitioners have been in judicial custody since 25.02.206 and that material part of the investigation is already completed and hence, he prays to grant regular bail to the petitioners. 5.
On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the same and submits that the allegations levelled against the petitioners are severe in nature; that the petitioners called the victim person and beaten him due to which he received severe injuries and stab injuries etc., which are grievous in nature and that the victim also admitted in the hospital as inpatient and therefore, at this stage, the petitioners are not entitled for grant of bail and hence, he prays to dismiss the petition.
- 4 - 6.
Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for both parties and perusal of the material on record, it appears that the petitioners have been in judicial custody since 25.02.2026. As seen from the record, the injured person and accused persons are relatives. The marriage between the victim and the said Soundarya is a love marriage which is against the wish of A.1 to A.6. The record shows that the victim was discharged from hospital. Considering the allegations levelled against the petitioners and period of incarceration of petitioners in jail, this Court deems it fit to grant regular bail to the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 6 subject to the following conditions:
(i) The petitioners-Accused Nos.1 to 6 shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Principal District Judge, YadadriBhuvanagiri District.
(ii) On such release, the petitioners-accused Nos.1 to 6 shall appear before the concerned SHO at 11:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., on every Wednesday for a period of eight (8) weeks or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation, and thereafter, as and when required.
(iii) The petitioners-Accused Nos.1 to 6 shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437 (3) of Cr.P.C. (presently, Section 480 (3) of BNSS).
- 5 - 7.
Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 23.03.2026 YVL