Sujatha Nambiar v. Shri P.V.Suresh Kumar

THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER AND THE HON'BLE SMT.JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI FAMILY COURT APPEAL Nos.302 and 281 OF 2011 COMMON JUDGMENT:

Since the facts of the case and issue involved in both these appeals are identical, both the appeals are being taken up together and disposed of by way of this common judgment.

2.

F.C.A.No.302 of 2011 is filed by the appellant, aggrieved by the order dated 19.10.2011 passed in O.P.No.1545 of 2008 by the learned Judge, Family Court, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar, whereby the subject O.P. filed by the petitioner to revoke the visitation right granted to the respondent by the decree dated 13.08.2007 in O.P.No.15 of 2007 by the Lok Adalat, Ranga Reddy District, was dismissed. 3.

F.C.A.No.281 of 2011 is filed by the appellant, aggrieved by the docket order, dated 19.10.2011 passed in I.A.No.2064 of 2011 in O.P.No.1545 of 2008 by the learned Judge, Family Court, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar, whereby, the subject petition filed by the respondent to direct the Principal, Abhayasa Residential Public School, N.H.No.7, Toopran (PO) Medak District, to allow him to spend some time with his son Ayush Nambiar in the school premises, was allowed, permitting the respondent to spend with his son for one hour after school hours on 15th day of every month.

4.

Heard. Perused the record.

5.

In the course of submissions, it is brought to the notice of this Court that due to passage of time, the ward, viz., Ayush Nambiar, has attained majority. Hence, the cause in the appeals does not survive for adjudication.

6.

Under these circumstances, the Family Court Appeals are dismissed as infructuous.

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ Dr. SHAMEEM AKTHER, J ___________________ JUVVADI SRIDEVI, J Date: 29.03.2022 ssp