Pampari Laxminarayana v. The State Of Telangana
t 3299l
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2250 OF 2022 Between:
Pampari Laxminarayana, S/o. Mallaiah, aged 63 yrs, Occ- Business, R/ o. Opp to P.S. Chankrinakha, Falaknuma, Hyderabad, N/o. Kolanpaka Road, Alair, Nalgonda District.
...Petitioner/Acc used
AND
1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad
2. Smt. Pampari Lavanya, Wo. Narsinga Rao, aged 46 years, Occ- Labour, Caste-Bestha, R/o. Kolanpaka Road, Alair, Nalgonda District.
...Respondents/Complainant
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records relating to the C.C.No. 596 of 2020 on the file of the court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, at Alair, registered U/ Sec. 354A IPC and quash the same l.A. NO: 2 OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in the C.C.No. 596 of 2020 on the file of the court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, at Alair, registered U/ Sec. 354,4 lPC, pending disposal of the criminal petition This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P DEVENDER, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri Papaiah Peddakula, Advocate for the Respondent No,2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON,BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL PETITION No.2 25U^ 0F 2022 / ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner seeking to \ \ \ quash the proceedings against him in C'C'No'596 of 2O2O on the \ fileofthelearnedJudicialMagistrateofFirstClass,atAlair(for short, "the trial Court").
2. No representation on behalf of petitioner' Heard Mr.E.Ganesh, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No. 1 -State.
3.LearnedAssistantPublicProsecutor,byfrlingthecopyof e-Courts proceedings, submits that C'C'No'596 of 2O2O ended up in acquittal vide judgment dated 06'03'2024 before the trial Court and no further orders are required in this Criminal Petition.Therefore,heseekstodismissttrisCriminalPetitionas infructuous.
4.
Recording the submissions of learned Assistant Public Prosecutor and upon taking the copy of e-Courts proceedings onto the lile, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous'
a!:lffiJ-a;. . ri:.. :,.. :-.: :
Miscellaleous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. SD/. T. JAYASREE DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Judicial First Class Magistrate at Aler.
2. The Station House Officer, Aler Police Station , Rachakonda Dist
3. One CC to SRI P DEVENDER, Advocate {OPUCI
4. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUTI
5. Two CD Copies M/gh
i HIGH COURT DATED: 03t0312025 1\\E STAI € ( c f,c ? B l{l'Y 2m 7c)
ORDER
at ,r+ CRLP.No.2250 ot 2022 o€'spar cv\ DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS THE CRIMINAL PETITION