M. Vijaymani v. Kousalya
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY SECOND APPEAL NO: 271 OF 2024 Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree dt.28-06-2023 passed in A.S.No.61 ot 2018, by the XXVII Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad, setting aside the same and reversing the judgment of the lower Court, dated. 09.08.2018, passed in O.S.No.298 of 2014 ,on the file of the Additional Rent Controller -cum- XVlll Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court at Secunderabad. Between:
M. Vijaymani, Wio. Late. M. Ravi Kumar, Aged about 53 years, Occ: Household, R/o, 5/3, SRT, Prakash Nagar, Begumpet, Hyderabad ...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF AND
1. Kousalya, Wo. Late. T. Narsaiah, Aged about 55 years, Occ: Housewife,
2. T. Raju, S/o. T. Narsaiah, Aged about 33 years, Occ: business., both 1 and 2 are R:/o. H.No. 1-37-174514, C240-59'1, Shiva Nagar, Balamrai, Secunderabad.
3. Ashok Kumar Goud, S/o. Rajaiah, Aged about 50 years, Occ: Real Estate Business, R/o. Sai Rukmaini Apartments, Sikh Village, Secunderabad. ...RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS lA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 of C.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in Decree and Judgment d1.28.06.2023 passed in A.S.No.61 of 2018, on the file of the XXVII Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, at Secunderabad.
:SRl BANDI SAI VAMSHI( Not Present) Counsel for the Appellant Counsel forthe Respondent Nos 1 & 2 : SRI GUMMALLA BHASKER REDDY Gounsel for the Respondent No.3 : NONE The Court made the following :JUDGMENT
HON'BLIi SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALTSHETTY SECOND APPEAL.No.27L of 2024 ORDER:
On the last date of hearing, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the appellant, and therefore, the matter was directed to be posted today under the caption 'for dismissal'. In spite of matter being listed today under the caption 'for dismissal', there is no representation for the appellant. This shows that the appellant has no interest in prosecuting thg case. Therefore, the second appeal is liable to be dismissed for default.
2.
Accordingly, Second Appeal is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscell.aneous petitions, if any, pending, shall stand closed.
I Sd/- T. VIJAY KUMAR DEPUW REGISTRAR \ \ //TRUE COPYII \ \ SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Court of the XXVII Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad (with records) .-' ---i
2. The Court of the Addltional Rent Controller -cum- XVlll Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court at Secunderabad (with records)
3. One CC to SRI BANDI SAI VAMSHI, Advocate [OPUC]
4. One CC to SRI GUMMALLA BHASKER REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]
5. Two CD Copies I I Pcsd/PSL
HIGH COURT \ DATED:2110412025 \ \ \ \ \'\ )) 28 0tI zffi \'r^ \o-'
\ .j/ ./'
.t {) lt-0 Es'pa r,'.:
JUDGMENT
SA.No.271 of 2024 DISMISSING THE SECOND APPEAL DEFAULT