Sri Vinod Kumar Valvekar v. Smt Usha Valvekar

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTI CE T.RAJANI F.C.A.M.P.No.192 of 2017 in/ and FAMI LY COURT APPEAL No.95 of 2017 30.03.2017 Between:

Vinod Kumar Valvekar ..Applicant/Appellant and Smt.Usha Valvekar ..Respondent Counsel for the applicant/appellant: Mr.Vijay Kumar Goud Counsel for the respondent: Mr.T.Muralidhar Rao The Court made the following:

CVNR,J & TR,J F.C.A.M.P.No.192 of 2017 in/and F.C.A.No.95 of 2017 30.03.2017 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy) The Family Court Appeal is filed against order and decree, dated 14.03.2016, in O.P.No.157 of 2011, whereby the Judge, Family Court, Ranga Reddy District, dismissed the said O.P. filed by the appellant for dissolution of the marriage with the respondent.

2.

The appellant has filed F.C.A.M.P.No.192 of 2017 to permit him to withdraw the appeal by recording the compromise. Along with this application, both the parties have filed memorandum of understanding. Paragraph 4 thereof contains the terms of the settlement, subject to which the appellant has agreed to withdraw the appeal. The terms read as follows: "1. That the I party herein agreed to withdraw the F.C.A.No.95 of 2017 pending before Hon'ble High Court.

2. That the I party agreed to make a representation before the concerned authorities with the request to put the II party as nominee and her entitlement of pension benefits as a dependent of the petitioner.

3. That the II party agreed not to pursue the orders passed in M.C.No.65 of 2008 on the file of the family court.

4. That the II party agreed to continue the matrimonial relationship and stay at Narayanpet, Mahabubnagar Dist.

5. That the both parties are agreed to lead happy matrimonial life and without initiate any proceedings against each other, if any deference"s arose they will solve themselves and before the well wishers."

3.

At the hearing, both the parties are personally present. They have reiterated the contents of the memorandum of understanding containing aforeextracted terms of settlement. 4.

In the light of the above facts, F.C.A.M.P.No.192 of 2017 is allowed and the Family Court Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. ______________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J __________________ T.RAJANI , J 30th March, 2017 GHN