Datla Kranthi, v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Panahayatraj Department,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE A.V.SESHA SAI W.P.No.840 of 2017 O R D E R:

It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development for the respondents that the issue in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the Judgment of this Court in SOMAGANI VENKATAK SUBBAMMA v. DI STRI CT PANCHAYAT OFFI CER, KRI SHNA DI STRI CT AND ANOTHER1. In the said judgment, this Court at paragraph No.9, held as under:

"9.

In this case the petitioner herein was prohibited from drawing the Gram Panchayat Funds permanently and completely, which is not contemplated under Rule 42 (1) of the Rules. For this reason, the writ petition has to be allowed."

2.

In view of the above judgment and for the reasons recorded therein, this writ petition is allowed, setting aside the Proceedings No.1747/2016/A3, dated 21.07.2016. However, it is open for the respondents to take appropriate action, in accordance with law. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ A.V.SESHA SAI, J Date:30.01.2017 grk 1 2006 (4) ALD 1

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE A.V.SESHA SAI W.P.No.840 of 2017 Dated 30.01.2017 grk