M/S.Gokul Constructions, v. D.S.Lokesh Kumar, Ias.,
\ [ 32e6 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 825OF 2023 Contempt Case filed Under Sections '1 0 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the respondents herein for willfully and disobeying/deliberately/ violating the Orders of the High Court dated 02.02.2023 passed in W.P.No.1B23 of 2023.
Between:
lvl/s. Gokul Constructions, rep. by its Proprietor V Yadav, aged about 43 years, Occ: Business, Rl/o Hyderapad.
Dayanand, H.No.5-2-9 S/o. late V.Mallesh 7 to 1O2, Jambagh, ...PETITIONER AND D.S.Lokesh Kumar, l.A.S., Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Lower Tank Bund, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT lA NO: 'f OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to stop any construction on the schedule property pursuant to impugned building permission vide permit no.21 56/GHMC ISLP 12O22-BP , dated 12-02-2022 in file no.005801lGHMCl3114ISLP12021-BP, during the pendency of the Contempt Case.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. B. MAHENDER REDDY 3Rl Counsel for the Respondent: M.A.K. MUKHEED (SC FOR GHMC) The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.825 of 2023 ORDER:
This Contempt Case is filed by the petitioner alleging the willful and deliberate violation of the orders passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.1823 of 2023 dated O2.O2.2023. 2.
Vide above order, the learned Single Judge disposed of the said Writ Petition directing the respondent Corporation to consider the representations dated 17.1O.2O22 and 19.12.2022 $fter issuing notice to all the stake holders including Writ Petitioners and respondents therein and also afford an opportunity of personal hearing and also examine all the documents produced by either parties and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
3.
Alleging non compliance of the above order passed by this Court, this present Contempt Case came to be filed by the petitioner.
4.
On 17.O4.2023, notice was issued to the respondent in the Contempt Case. After receipt of notice, respondent filed I I counter affidavit on 08.06.2023. In the counter affidavit filed by the respondent, it is inter alfa stated that in compliance of the order of this Court dated O2.O2.2O23 passed in Writ Petition
\ \ C.('.No.825 of 2023 dt: 08.06.2023 \ \\ \ \ No. 1823 of 2023, the respondent has issued notice to all the concerned parties and after affording an opportunity of hearing to both the parties, it has disposed of the representations submitted by the petitioner vide referred above and passed a speaking order vide Proc.No.O05801/GHMC/31 14 / SLP2 /2022BP dated 25.05.2023. 5.
In view of the above; this Court is of the opinion that since the respondent has complied with the order passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.1823 of 2023 dated, 02.O2.2023 and disposed of the representations of the petitioner referred above, there is no willful and deliberate violation on the part of the respondent in violating the above order.
6.
Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed.
However, liberty is granted to the petitioner if he is still aggrieved by the speaking order passed by the respondent dated 25.O5.2023, he is at liberty to question the same in accordance with law. No costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
SD- M. RAMANA KRISHNA DEPUDT REGISTRAR //TRUE coPY/l ( Ul SECTION OFFICER -/ To, Sri D.S.Lokesh Kumar, IAS., Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Lower Tank Bund, Hyderabad.
One CC to SRl. B. IVAHENDER REDDY Advocate IOPUC] One CC to SRl. IM.A.K. TMUKHEED (SC FOR GHI\/C) [OPUC] Two CD Copies 2.
3.
4.
CHR q
HIGH COURT DATED:0810612023 r\E S]^14:
ORDER
J3 ruJUtl 2tr13 C.C.No.825 of 2023 ;1 , .z .. o ./'
,,// I I I I CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS @@ &ro 29t.\."