P.Ramoji Rao v. Transmission Corporation Of Andhra Pradesh Limited

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI WRI T PETI TI ON No.5182 of 2006 ORDER:

The learned counsel for the writ petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and that, therefore, the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous. 2.

Smt. Jagarlamudi Koteswari Devi, the learned Standing Counsel for APSPDCL representing the respondents is present. 3.

Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this writ petition shall stand closed.

_________________ M.Seetharama Murti, J 27th February, 2017 Bvv