Godavarthi Chakradhar Acharyulu v. The State Of Telangana

?\ U HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JLINE TWO THOUSAND AND NINETEEN :PRESENT:

THE HON'BLE JUSTICE G.SRI DEVI CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2348 OF 2019 Betrveen:

Godavarthi Chakadhar Acharlulu, S/o Rama Krishna, Petitioner/Accused-5 AND The State ofTelangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad Respondent/Complainant Petition under Sections 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition and the grounds filed therein, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner/A-5 on bail in Crime No.l74 of 2019 of Saroomagar P.S., Ranga Reddy District on such terms and conditions as this Hon'ble Court deems ht and proper in the interest ofjustice. Counsel for the Petitioner :

SRI D.BHASKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent :

ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following;

HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI CRIMINAL PETITION No.2348 of 2019 ORDER:

The petitioner, who is Accused No.5, has filed the present Criminal Petition under Sections 437 and 439 Cr.P.C. seeking enlargement on bail in Crime No.174 of 20 i9 of Saroornagar Police Station, Ranga Reddy District, registered for the offence punishable under Section 8(c) r/w. Section 21(b) of the NDPS Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that contraband has been seized from the possession of A. 1 and A.2 and the name of the petitioner/A.S has come to light in the confessional statement of A. 1 and there is no other material to connect the petitioner with the offence a1leged. Nothing has been seized from the possession of the petitioner/A.S and he is innocent of the offence alleged against him. It is contended that material part of investigation is completed and the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions imposed by this Court.

On the other hand, the learned Additional Public I Prosecutor opposed the bail application.

A perusal of the First Information Report would disclose that contraband has been seized from the possession of A. 1 and A.2 and the name of the petitioner/A.S has come to light in the confessional statement of A. 1. Nothing has been seized

1_ T '

.n o ^l!lo*'*rn,, from the possession of the petitioner/A.5. Since the main accused have already been released on bail, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner on certain terms and conditions. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is a-llowed and the petitioner/A.S shall be released on bail on his executing a personal bond for Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar, and on a further condition that the petitioner/A.S shall appear before the Station House Officer, Saroornagar Police Station, on every Monday between 5.00 p.m. and 6.00 p.m. and mark his presence for a period of one month or till filing of the charge sheet, whichever is earlier. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

Sd/- K.SAILESHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// L! 11/ FOT ASSISTANT REGISTLAR o T t, The Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Cyberabad, RR District, at L.B. Nagar. The VI Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate, Rachakonda, L.B. Nagar. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Cherlapally, RR District. The Station House Officer, Saroomagar Police Station, Rachakonda Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court ofTelangana, at Hyderabad (OUT) one CC to Sri D.Bhaskar Reddy, Advocate (OpUC) one Spare Copy

& . . .; r. ;:.1,L.

,-. l ":lir r,::1 .il.:

:L, '.

i...ltprr-.rOu Rt'

' ' i.i.

GSD,.I DATE: 03-06-2019

ORDER

CRL.P. NO.2348 ()F 2019 BAII, OF z> U) \$ \\ +