← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/4037/2025dismissed as infructuous

Rahul Rastogi v. The State Of Telangana

2025-03-24N.Tukaramji3 pages

132171

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4037 OF 2025 Between:

'1 . Rahul Rastogi, S/o.late Major Susheel Chandra Rastogi, aged about 61 years, Occ Business, R/o.9-4-86/21 5, Salarjung Colony, Tolichowki, Hyderabad - 500 008.

2. Sunil Joginpally, S/o.late Ananda Rao, aged about 50 years, Occ. Business, trJo.8-2-277112, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad - 500 034. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED NOs. 1 &2 AND The State of Telangana, PS, Raidurgam, Represented by its Public Prosecutor High Court of Telangana.

Urbanwoods Reality LLP, Rep.Mr.Puwada Ravindra, Sio. Radhakrishna Murthy, aged about 45 years, Occ .working in Urbanwoods Reality LLP, at Flat No.102, Sri Durga Chambers, Panjagutta, Hyderabad - 500 082. (There is no absolute relationship between petitioner and defacto Complainant) ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash FIR No.1013 of 2024 of PS Raidurgam, dated 17.10.2024 in the interest of justice.

l.A. NO: 2OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in FIR No.1013 of 2024 of PS Raidurgam, daied 17.1O.2024.

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri S Nagesh Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No- 1 The Court made the following: ORDER

-*F+Bz . i'

.../ THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE N. TUKARAMJI CRIMINAL PETITION No.4037 ot 2025 ORDER:

This petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quashment of proceedings in FIR No.1013 of 2024 pending on the file of the Raidurgam Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate, against the petitioners-accused Nos.1 and 2.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that as per the written instructions received by the police concern, the proceedings against the petitioners are closed as 'civil in nature'

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners also submits that no cause survives in this criminal petition 4.

ln view of the above development, no cause survives in this criminal petition 5.

Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed Sd/- P.CH. NAGABHUSHAMBA rT \DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY/I I\ 1--- ; l\ sEcrtoN oFFtcER To, The XIll Addl.Judicial Magistrate of First Ctass, Cy[/raUao at Rajendranagar. The Station, House Officer, Raiduragm r police Station,Cyberabad One CC to SRI S NAGESH REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD Copies 1.

2.

.l 4.

W,

t HIGH COURT DATED: 2410312025 '14 02 /'UE 2W !

(.

)) o tt .:,/ :7 a ---.:=:--'

ORDER

CRLP.No.4037 of 2025 DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS \ q l/