Katari Prabhakar v. The State Of Telangana

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITION No.9008 of 2019 ORDER:

This writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission with the consent of both the parties.

This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief :- " ......to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction particularly one in the nature of the Writ of Mandamus Declare the action of the respondents in not considering cases of the Petitioners for regularizing of their services as regular teachers in any of the schools situated in Non Scheduled area of Eturunagaram of Warangal district by taking into consideration of their past service is arbitrary, unreasonable and consequently direct the respondents to consider the representation of the Petitioners by regularizing their services as regular teachers in any of the schools situated in Non Scheduled area of Eturunagaram of Warangal district, State of Telangana....." .

Heard Mr.K.Muralidhar Reddy, learned counsel for petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare. It has been contended by the petitioners that they were appointed as Community Teachers during April, 1994 on honorarium basis and they have completed five years of service and after completion of five years, their services were disengaged by the respondents without assigning any reasons. Thereafter, they have made representations before the respondents. But, so far, the respondents have not disposed of the said representations nor considered their cases for regularisation.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has contended that appropriate orders be passed in the writ petition directing the

respondents to consider the cases of petitioners for regularization by duly considering the representations submitted by them. Learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents has contended that the present writ petition is filed by the petitioners nearly after twenty years seeking regularisation of their services and their services were discharged in the year 1999 itself and therefore, the request of the petitioners cannot be considered for regularisation. Therefore, there are no merits in the writ petition and the same is liable to be dismissed.

This Court, having considered the rival submissions, is of the considered view that that the present writ petition is filed nearly after twenty years seeking regularisation of the services of the petitioners and the services of the petitioners were discharged way back in the year 1999. Therefore, the request of the petitioners cannot be considered, as they have approached this Court nearly after twenty years. Hence, there are no merits in the writ petition and the same is liable to be dismissed.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, J Date: 25-04-2019 Prv