Lingutla Prasad Naidu , Prasad v. The State Of A.P.

I I 2690 l HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY ,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF IVARCH, TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHTEEN :PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T. RAJANI CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2784 OF 2018 Between:

Lingutla Prasad Naidu @ Prasad, S/o Venkataiah, Petitione r/Accused No.1 O AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad RespondenUComplainant Petition under Sections 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the memo of grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioner/A-10 on bail in connection with Cr.No. 50812017 on the file of Rajampet (U/G) Police Station, Kadapa District, on such terms and conditions. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and memo of grounds filed herein, and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M Jayaram Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner, and of Public Prosecutor (AP) for Respondent, the Court made the following ORDER:

SMT. JUSTICE T. RAJANI CRIMINAL PETITION No.2784 OF 2018 ORDER:

This petition is filed, under Sections 437 and 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. seeking to enlarge the petitioner, who is accused Nos.10. on bail, in Cr.No.508 of 201'7 on the file of the Rajampet (U/G) Police Station, Kadapa District. The offences alleged against the petitioners are Sections 20(b) (ii) (B) r/w Section 8 (c) of NDPS Act, 1985.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner/A.10, learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was arrested on 12.01.2018 and as per the case of the prosecution, 80 gms., of brown sugar, rvhich is less than the commercial quantity, was seized from the petitioner. 4.

Material part of investigation is said to have been completed and the same is not refuted by the learned Public Prosecutor. 5.

Hence, considering the above circumstances, it is a fit case for grant of bail. The petition is, therefore, allowed and the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail, on condition of his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Trventy Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Rajampet. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pencling. stand closed. sd/ - T.NAGESH BABU REGI ,TRUE COPY// ASSIST RAR For ASSISTAN REGIST To, 1'TheJudicialtvlagistrateofFirstClass,Rajampet,KadapaDistrict Z.TfreSuperintendent,CentralPrison'Kadapa'KadapaDistrict s. The Station f-for.u Otfi""r, Rajampet (U/G) Police Station' Kadapa District,

4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor (TG), High-court, Hyderabad (oUT) s. One CC to Sri tvl' Jayram Reddy' Advocate (OPUC)

6. One sPare coPY Skm

€ HIGIT COURI'

TR.J DATED: l4103/2018

ORDER

CRLP.No.2784 of 2018 ,t DIRECTION