← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/7500/2018dismissed no costs

A.Ramana v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh,

2018-03-14C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy,Gudiseva Shyam Prasad2 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE GUDI SEVA SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION No.7500 of 2018 Date: 14.03.2018 Betw een:

A. Ramana, S/o. Rajulu, Visakhapatnam, and two others.

..... Petitioners And:

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, and two others.

.....Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Mr. M. Janardan Rao Counsel for respondent No.1: -- Counsel for respondent No.2: -- Counsel for respondent No.3: -- The Court made the following:

CVNR, J & GSP, J WP.No.7500 of 2018 ORDER: (per Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy) This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: "...to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the impugned award of the 2nd respondent passed in Arb. Case No.318/2014 Dt:19-12-2015 as illegal, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice and consequently by declaring the impugned award as non-est in law direct the 2nd respondent to conduct a fresh enquiry by issuing a notice to the petitioners and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."

At the hearing, Mr. Janardhan Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that as the Writ Petition is not maintainable, the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to avail appropriate legal remedies.

The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel, I.A.No.1 of 2018 filed by the petitioners for interim relief stands disposed of as infructuous.

__________________________ JUSTI CE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY ______________________________ JUSTI CE G. SHYAM PRASAD Date: 14.03.2018 va